Commit b5e8a3a
committed
Auto merge of #120151 - Nilstrieb:hashmap-testing, r=<try>
[PERF EXPERIMENTS] Hashmap experiment
I've been thinking about some sort of more efficient way of dealing with small hashmaps, since the vast majority of hashmaps are small..
(non-empty maps only)
```
0.5..= 1: 0 (0.0%)
1..= 2: 15 (0.0061269%)
2..= 4: 176617 (72.14%)
4..= 8: 203093 (82.955%)
8..= 16: 232412 (94.93%)
16..= 32: 240221 (98.12%)
32..= 64: 243007 (99.258%)
64..= 128: 244165 (99.731%)
128..= 256: 244512 (99.873%)
256..= 512: 244692 (99.946%)
512..= 1024: 244734 (99.963%)
1024..= 2048: 244763 (99.975%)
2048..= 4096: 244780 (99.982%)
4096..= 8192: 244795 (99.988%)
8192..= 16384: 244808 (99.993%)
16384..= 32768: 244816 (99.997%)
```
let's try something with the most popular small map
r? `@ghost`1 file changed
+26
-22
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
41 | 41 | | |
42 | 42 | | |
43 | 43 | | |
44 | | - | |
45 | | - | |
| 44 | + | |
| 45 | + | |
| 46 | + | |
| 47 | + | |
46 | 48 | | |
47 | 49 | | |
48 | 50 | | |
| |||
51 | 53 | | |
52 | 54 | | |
53 | 55 | | |
54 | | - | |
55 | | - | |
| 56 | + | |
| 57 | + | |
| 58 | + | |
| 59 | + | |
56 | 60 | | |
57 | 61 | | |
58 | 62 | | |
| |||
64 | 68 | | |
65 | 69 | | |
66 | 70 | | |
67 | | - | |
68 | | - | |
69 | | - | |
70 | | - | |
71 | | - | |
72 | | - | |
73 | | - | |
74 | | - | |
75 | | - | |
| 71 | + | |
| 72 | + | |
| 73 | + | |
| 74 | + | |
| 75 | + | |
| 76 | + | |
| 77 | + | |
| 78 | + | |
| 79 | + | |
76 | 80 | | |
77 | 81 | | |
78 | 82 | | |
| |||
90 | 94 | | |
91 | 95 | | |
92 | 96 | | |
93 | | - | |
94 | | - | |
95 | | - | |
96 | | - | |
97 | | - | |
98 | | - | |
99 | | - | |
100 | | - | |
101 | | - | |
| 97 | + | |
| 98 | + | |
| 99 | + | |
| 100 | + | |
| 101 | + | |
| 102 | + | |
| 103 | + | |
| 104 | + | |
| 105 | + | |
102 | 106 | | |
103 | 107 | | |
104 | 108 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments