Rollup merge of #121977 - Lee-Janggun:master, r=WaffleLapkin

Doc: Fix incorrect reference to integer in Atomic{Ptr,Bool}::as_ptr.

I am assuming "resulting integer" is an error, since we are talking about pointers and booleans here. Seems like it was missed while copy & pasting the docs from the integer versions. I also checked the rest of the docs, and this was the only mention of integers.

Author: matthiaskrgr

library/core/src/sync/atomic.rs

@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ impl AtomicBool {
 
     /// Returns a mutable pointer to the underlying [`bool`].
     ///
-    /// Doing non-atomic reads and writes on the resulting integer can be a data race.
+    /// Doing non-atomic reads and writes on the resulting boolean can be a data race.
     /// This method is mostly useful for FFI, where the function signature may use
     /// `*mut bool` instead of `&AtomicBool`.
     ///
@@ -2031,7 +2031,7 @@ impl<T> AtomicPtr<T> {
 
     /// Returns a mutable pointer to the underlying pointer.
     ///
-    /// Doing non-atomic reads and writes on the resulting integer can be a data race.
+    /// Doing non-atomic reads and writes on the resulting pointer can be a data race.
     /// This method is mostly useful for FFI, where the function signature may use
     /// `*mut *mut T` instead of `&AtomicPtr<T>`.
     ///