|
| 1 | +use std::collections::BTreeSet; |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +use rustc_data_structures::graph::DirectedGraph; |
| 4 | +use rustc_index::bit_set::BitSet; |
| 5 | +use rustc_middle::mir::coverage::{ |
| 6 | + BlockMarkerId, BranchSpan, ConditionInfo, CoverageKind, MCDCBranchSpan, MCDCDecisionSpan, |
| 7 | +}; |
| 8 | +use rustc_middle::mir::{self, BasicBlock, StatementKind}; |
| 9 | +use rustc_span::Span; |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +use crate::coverage::graph::{BasicCoverageBlock, CoverageGraph, START_BCB}; |
| 12 | +use crate::coverage::spans::{ |
| 13 | + extract_refined_covspans, unexpand_into_body_span_with_visible_macro, |
| 14 | +}; |
| 15 | +use crate::coverage::ExtractedHirInfo; |
| 16 | +use rustc_index::IndexVec; |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +#[derive(Clone, Debug)] |
| 19 | +pub(super) enum BcbMappingKind { |
| 20 | + /// Associates an ordinary executable code span with its corresponding BCB. |
| 21 | + Code(BasicCoverageBlock), |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | + // Ordinary branch mappings are stored separately, so they don't have a |
| 24 | + // variant in this enum. |
| 25 | + // |
| 26 | + /// Associates a mcdc branch span with condition info besides fields for normal branch. |
| 27 | + MCDCBranch { |
| 28 | + true_bcb: BasicCoverageBlock, |
| 29 | + false_bcb: BasicCoverageBlock, |
| 30 | + /// If `None`, this actually represents a normal branch mapping inserted |
| 31 | + /// for code that was too complex for MC/DC. |
| 32 | + condition_info: Option<ConditionInfo>, |
| 33 | + decision_depth: u16, |
| 34 | + }, |
| 35 | + /// Associates a mcdc decision with its join BCB. |
| 36 | + MCDCDecision { |
| 37 | + end_bcbs: BTreeSet<BasicCoverageBlock>, |
| 38 | + bitmap_idx: u32, |
| 39 | + conditions_num: u16, |
| 40 | + decision_depth: u16, |
| 41 | + }, |
| 42 | +} |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +#[derive(Debug)] |
| 45 | +pub(super) struct BcbMapping { |
| 46 | + pub(super) kind: BcbMappingKind, |
| 47 | + pub(super) span: Span, |
| 48 | +} |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +/// This is separate from [`BcbMappingKind`] to help prepare for larger changes |
| 51 | +/// that will be needed for improved branch coverage in the future. |
| 52 | +/// (See <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/124217>.) |
| 53 | +#[derive(Debug)] |
| 54 | +pub(super) struct BcbBranchPair { |
| 55 | + pub(super) span: Span, |
| 56 | + pub(super) true_bcb: BasicCoverageBlock, |
| 57 | + pub(super) false_bcb: BasicCoverageBlock, |
| 58 | +} |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | +pub(super) struct CoverageSpans { |
| 61 | + bcb_has_mappings: BitSet<BasicCoverageBlock>, |
| 62 | + pub(super) mappings: Vec<BcbMapping>, |
| 63 | + pub(super) branch_pairs: Vec<BcbBranchPair>, |
| 64 | + test_vector_bitmap_bytes: u32, |
| 65 | +} |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | +impl CoverageSpans { |
| 68 | + pub(super) fn bcb_has_coverage_spans(&self, bcb: BasicCoverageBlock) -> bool { |
| 69 | + self.bcb_has_mappings.contains(bcb) |
| 70 | + } |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | + pub(super) fn test_vector_bitmap_bytes(&self) -> u32 { |
| 73 | + self.test_vector_bitmap_bytes |
| 74 | + } |
| 75 | +} |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | +/// Extracts coverage-relevant spans from MIR, and associates them with |
| 78 | +/// their corresponding BCBs. |
| 79 | +/// |
| 80 | +/// Returns `None` if no coverage-relevant spans could be extracted. |
| 81 | +pub(super) fn generate_coverage_spans( |
| 82 | + mir_body: &mir::Body<'_>, |
| 83 | + hir_info: &ExtractedHirInfo, |
| 84 | + basic_coverage_blocks: &CoverageGraph, |
| 85 | +) -> Option<CoverageSpans> { |
| 86 | + let mut mappings = vec![]; |
| 87 | + let mut branch_pairs = vec![]; |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | + if hir_info.is_async_fn { |
| 90 | + // An async function desugars into a function that returns a future, |
| 91 | + // with the user code wrapped in a closure. Any spans in the desugared |
| 92 | + // outer function will be unhelpful, so just keep the signature span |
| 93 | + // and ignore all of the spans in the MIR body. |
| 94 | + if let Some(span) = hir_info.fn_sig_span_extended { |
| 95 | + mappings.push(BcbMapping { kind: BcbMappingKind::Code(START_BCB), span }); |
| 96 | + } |
| 97 | + } else { |
| 98 | + extract_refined_covspans(mir_body, hir_info, basic_coverage_blocks, &mut mappings); |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | + branch_pairs.extend(extract_branch_pairs(mir_body, hir_info, basic_coverage_blocks)); |
| 101 | + |
| 102 | + mappings.extend(extract_mcdc_mappings(mir_body, hir_info.body_span, basic_coverage_blocks)); |
| 103 | + } |
| 104 | + |
| 105 | + if mappings.is_empty() && branch_pairs.is_empty() { |
| 106 | + return None; |
| 107 | + } |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | + // Identify which BCBs have one or more mappings. |
| 110 | + let mut bcb_has_mappings = BitSet::new_empty(basic_coverage_blocks.num_nodes()); |
| 111 | + let mut insert = |bcb| { |
| 112 | + bcb_has_mappings.insert(bcb); |
| 113 | + }; |
| 114 | + let mut test_vector_bitmap_bytes = 0; |
| 115 | + for BcbMapping { kind, span: _ } in &mappings { |
| 116 | + match *kind { |
| 117 | + BcbMappingKind::Code(bcb) => insert(bcb), |
| 118 | + BcbMappingKind::MCDCBranch { true_bcb, false_bcb, .. } => { |
| 119 | + insert(true_bcb); |
| 120 | + insert(false_bcb); |
| 121 | + } |
| 122 | + BcbMappingKind::MCDCDecision { bitmap_idx, conditions_num, .. } => { |
| 123 | + // `bcb_has_mappings` is used for inject coverage counters |
| 124 | + // but they are not needed for decision BCBs. |
| 125 | + // While the length of test vector bitmap should be calculated here. |
| 126 | + test_vector_bitmap_bytes = test_vector_bitmap_bytes |
| 127 | + .max(bitmap_idx + (1_u32 << conditions_num as u32).div_ceil(8)); |
| 128 | + } |
| 129 | + } |
| 130 | + } |
| 131 | + for &BcbBranchPair { true_bcb, false_bcb, .. } in &branch_pairs { |
| 132 | + insert(true_bcb); |
| 133 | + insert(false_bcb); |
| 134 | + } |
| 135 | + |
| 136 | + Some(CoverageSpans { bcb_has_mappings, mappings, branch_pairs, test_vector_bitmap_bytes }) |
| 137 | +} |
| 138 | + |
| 139 | +fn resolve_block_markers( |
| 140 | + branch_info: &mir::coverage::BranchInfo, |
| 141 | + mir_body: &mir::Body<'_>, |
| 142 | +) -> IndexVec<BlockMarkerId, Option<BasicBlock>> { |
| 143 | + let mut block_markers = IndexVec::<BlockMarkerId, Option<BasicBlock>>::from_elem_n( |
| 144 | + None, |
| 145 | + branch_info.num_block_markers, |
| 146 | + ); |
| 147 | + |
| 148 | + // Fill out the mapping from block marker IDs to their enclosing blocks. |
| 149 | + for (bb, data) in mir_body.basic_blocks.iter_enumerated() { |
| 150 | + for statement in &data.statements { |
| 151 | + if let StatementKind::Coverage(CoverageKind::BlockMarker { id }) = statement.kind { |
| 152 | + block_markers[id] = Some(bb); |
| 153 | + } |
| 154 | + } |
| 155 | + } |
| 156 | + |
| 157 | + block_markers |
| 158 | +} |
| 159 | + |
| 160 | +// FIXME: There is currently a lot of redundancy between |
| 161 | +// `extract_branch_pairs` and `extract_mcdc_mappings`. This is needed so |
| 162 | +// that they can each be modified without interfering with the other, but in |
| 163 | +// the long term we should try to bring them together again when branch coverage |
| 164 | +// and MC/DC coverage support are more mature. |
| 165 | + |
| 166 | +pub(super) fn extract_branch_pairs( |
| 167 | + mir_body: &mir::Body<'_>, |
| 168 | + hir_info: &ExtractedHirInfo, |
| 169 | + basic_coverage_blocks: &CoverageGraph, |
| 170 | +) -> Vec<BcbBranchPair> { |
| 171 | + let Some(branch_info) = mir_body.coverage_branch_info.as_deref() else { return vec![] }; |
| 172 | + |
| 173 | + let block_markers = resolve_block_markers(branch_info, mir_body); |
| 174 | + |
| 175 | + branch_info |
| 176 | + .branch_spans |
| 177 | + .iter() |
| 178 | + .filter_map(|&BranchSpan { span: raw_span, true_marker, false_marker }| { |
| 179 | + // For now, ignore any branch span that was introduced by |
| 180 | + // expansion. This makes things like assert macros less noisy. |
| 181 | + if !raw_span.ctxt().outer_expn_data().is_root() { |
| 182 | + return None; |
| 183 | + } |
| 184 | + let (span, _) = |
| 185 | + unexpand_into_body_span_with_visible_macro(raw_span, hir_info.body_span)?; |
| 186 | + |
| 187 | + let bcb_from_marker = |
| 188 | + |marker: BlockMarkerId| basic_coverage_blocks.bcb_from_bb(block_markers[marker]?); |
| 189 | + |
| 190 | + let true_bcb = bcb_from_marker(true_marker)?; |
| 191 | + let false_bcb = bcb_from_marker(false_marker)?; |
| 192 | + |
| 193 | + Some(BcbBranchPair { span, true_bcb, false_bcb }) |
| 194 | + }) |
| 195 | + .collect::<Vec<_>>() |
| 196 | +} |
| 197 | + |
| 198 | +pub(super) fn extract_mcdc_mappings( |
| 199 | + mir_body: &mir::Body<'_>, |
| 200 | + body_span: Span, |
| 201 | + basic_coverage_blocks: &CoverageGraph, |
| 202 | +) -> Vec<BcbMapping> { |
| 203 | + let Some(branch_info) = mir_body.coverage_branch_info.as_deref() else { |
| 204 | + return vec![]; |
| 205 | + }; |
| 206 | + |
| 207 | + let block_markers = resolve_block_markers(branch_info, mir_body); |
| 208 | + |
| 209 | + let bcb_from_marker = |
| 210 | + |marker: BlockMarkerId| basic_coverage_blocks.bcb_from_bb(block_markers[marker]?); |
| 211 | + |
| 212 | + let check_branch_bcb = |
| 213 | + |raw_span: Span, true_marker: BlockMarkerId, false_marker: BlockMarkerId| { |
| 214 | + // For now, ignore any branch span that was introduced by |
| 215 | + // expansion. This makes things like assert macros less noisy. |
| 216 | + if !raw_span.ctxt().outer_expn_data().is_root() { |
| 217 | + return None; |
| 218 | + } |
| 219 | + let (span, _) = unexpand_into_body_span_with_visible_macro(raw_span, body_span)?; |
| 220 | + |
| 221 | + let true_bcb = bcb_from_marker(true_marker)?; |
| 222 | + let false_bcb = bcb_from_marker(false_marker)?; |
| 223 | + Some((span, true_bcb, false_bcb)) |
| 224 | + }; |
| 225 | + |
| 226 | + let mcdc_branch_filter_map = |&MCDCBranchSpan { |
| 227 | + span: raw_span, |
| 228 | + true_marker, |
| 229 | + false_marker, |
| 230 | + condition_info, |
| 231 | + decision_depth, |
| 232 | + }| { |
| 233 | + check_branch_bcb(raw_span, true_marker, false_marker).map(|(span, true_bcb, false_bcb)| { |
| 234 | + BcbMapping { |
| 235 | + kind: BcbMappingKind::MCDCBranch { |
| 236 | + true_bcb, |
| 237 | + false_bcb, |
| 238 | + condition_info, |
| 239 | + decision_depth, |
| 240 | + }, |
| 241 | + span, |
| 242 | + } |
| 243 | + }) |
| 244 | + }; |
| 245 | + |
| 246 | + let mut next_bitmap_idx = 0; |
| 247 | + |
| 248 | + let decision_filter_map = |decision: &MCDCDecisionSpan| { |
| 249 | + let (span, _) = unexpand_into_body_span_with_visible_macro(decision.span, body_span)?; |
| 250 | + |
| 251 | + let end_bcbs = decision |
| 252 | + .end_markers |
| 253 | + .iter() |
| 254 | + .map(|&marker| bcb_from_marker(marker)) |
| 255 | + .collect::<Option<_>>()?; |
| 256 | + |
| 257 | + let bitmap_idx = next_bitmap_idx; |
| 258 | + next_bitmap_idx += (1_u32 << decision.conditions_num).div_ceil(8); |
| 259 | + |
| 260 | + Some(BcbMapping { |
| 261 | + kind: BcbMappingKind::MCDCDecision { |
| 262 | + end_bcbs, |
| 263 | + bitmap_idx, |
| 264 | + conditions_num: decision.conditions_num as u16, |
| 265 | + decision_depth: decision.decision_depth, |
| 266 | + }, |
| 267 | + span, |
| 268 | + }) |
| 269 | + }; |
| 270 | + |
| 271 | + std::iter::empty() |
| 272 | + .chain(branch_info.mcdc_branch_spans.iter().filter_map(mcdc_branch_filter_map)) |
| 273 | + .chain(branch_info.mcdc_decision_spans.iter().filter_map(decision_filter_map)) |
| 274 | + .collect::<Vec<_>>() |
| 275 | +} |
0 commit comments