Skip to content

1.17.0 armv7 fails in debuginfo-gdb test macro-stepping.rs #42673

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
infinity0 opened this issue Jun 15, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

1.17.0 armv7 fails in debuginfo-gdb test macro-stepping.rs #42673

infinity0 opened this issue Jun 15, 2017 · 2 comments
Labels
C-bug Category: This is a bug. O-Arm Target: 32-bit Arm processors (armv6, armv7, thumb...), including 64-bit Arm in AArch32 state

Comments

@infinity0
Copy link
Contributor

See https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rustc&arch=armhf&ver=1.17.0%2Bdfsg2-4&stamp=1497504124&raw=0 - similar to #37225 but for armv7.

error: line not found in debugger output: [...]#inc-loc3[...]
status: exit code: 0
command: /usr/bin/gdb -quiet -batch -nx -command=/«BUILDDIR»/rustc-1.17.0+dfsg2/build/armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/test/debuginfo/macro-stepping.debugger.script
stdout:
[..]

For the time being, I'll disable this test for armv7 in Debian, like how it already is disabled for aarch64.

@infinity0 infinity0 changed the title 1.17.0 armv7 fails in test macro-stepping.rs 1.17.0 armv7 fails in debuginfo-gdb test macro-stepping.rs Jun 15, 2017
@sanxiyn sanxiyn added the O-Arm Target: 32-bit Arm processors (armv6, armv7, thumb...), including 64-bit Arm in AArch32 state label Jun 19, 2017
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum added the C-bug Category: This is a bug. label Jul 27, 2017
@Enselic
Copy link
Member

Enselic commented Sep 15, 2023

Triage: Does this test still fail? If yes, I'm still not sure this is worth keeping an issue open for? After all, this is a Tier 2 target, so tests are not guaranteed to pass. I agree it made sense to report this 6 years ago because someone might have showed up and said "oh it fails? I'll fix it then". But since that hasn't happened for 6 years, it seems unlikely to ever happen.

@Enselic
Copy link
Member

Enselic commented Apr 18, 2024

Triage: No objections to close, so let's close.

@Enselic Enselic closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Apr 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C-bug Category: This is a bug. O-Arm Target: 32-bit Arm processors (armv6, armv7, thumb...), including 64-bit Arm in AArch32 state
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants