You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Per this thread on the mailing list, structs should be required to either be written struct Foo; or to have at least one field. This avoids various ambiguities when parsing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is this as simple as modifying the parser to prevent the "struct Foo {}" syntax (i.e. a struct with no fields) & modifying it to support the braceless syntax, or is more work needed to make it a newtype? And if so, what?
Per this thread on the mailing list, structs should be required to either be written
struct Foo;
or to have at least one field. This avoids various ambiguities when parsing.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: