Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Policy: Referring to rustc lints #36

Open
ehuss opened this issue Mar 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Policy: Referring to rustc lints #36

ehuss opened this issue Mar 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
C-meta Category: Meta discussion about the repository itself. We should refine each use of the policy label

Comments

@ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

ehuss commented Mar 1, 2024

Generally the Reference has avoided ever mentioning rustc lints, but unfortunately there are a few lints that are really relevant and important to certain sections of the language.

  • ehuss's preference: Have a policy against referring to them except in extreme situations where an Editor's note provides some very useful context. For example unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn, and in particular its relationship to the new Edition.
@JoelMarcey JoelMarcey added the C-meta Category: Meta discussion about the repository itself. We should refine each use of the policy label label Mar 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C-meta Category: Meta discussion about the repository itself. We should refine each use of the policy label
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants