You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In #166 I've added some architecture intrinsics (e.g. the cpuid intrinsic) to a misc module in x86.
Our internal module names are private and do not affect users, but IMO the name misc is pretty bad and we should group these intrinsics in a more consistent way.
We could name those modules .../i386/i486/i586/i686/... instead.
The main issue I have with this is that, for example, detecting i686 using target feature leads to:
In #166 I've added some architecture intrinsics (e.g. the
cpuid
intrinsic) to amisc
module inx86
.Our internal module names are private and do not affect users, but IMO the name
misc
is pretty bad and we should group these intrinsics in a more consistent way.We could name those modules .../
i386
/i486
/i586
/i686
/... instead.The main issue I have with this is that, for example, detecting
i686
using target feature leads to:is IMO a bit messy.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: