Stabilizing features: Inconsistent translation for "Would unblock my use-case"

[Marcono1234]

Hello,
for the question about stabilizing features (in English "Which unimplemented (or nightly only) features are you looking for to be stabilized?"), the option "Would unblock my use-case" seems to be translated inconsistently, which could potentially skew the results:

• English & most other languages

  Would unblock my use-case

  Side note: The question here is though how strong this "my" is, and whether this option also applies if for example you develop multiple Rust projects and only one of it is blocked. Not sure how strict the other languages have translated this "my use-case" vs. "a use", or similar.

• Chinese (zh-cn)

  如果稳定版本中本功能可用，则会解决想用Rust适用我的用例时遇到的障碍

  German (de)

  Würde es mir erlauben, Rust zu nutzen

  At least the German translation says "Would allow me to use Rust", which sounds as if due to this missing feature the user is not using Rust at all.

• Japanese (ja)

  高優先度

  The translation seems to be "high priority", which is quite unspecific compared to the other ones. Users might choose this option despite the missing feature not completely blocking them.

[Kobzol]

Thanks! The "High Priority" was an answer last year, perhaps it was not re-translated this year. If you could send PRs that improve the translation, that would be great! The translations are here.

[Marcono1234]

Sorry, I can only suggest an improvement for German. Should I chose a translation for "unblock my use-case" there too?

[Kobzol]

Yes. that was the intended meaning.