You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Conversely, we might inject the crates and (explicit and implicit) stdlib deps to create a unified workspace. We would also combine the lock files to create a lockfile for the combined workspace with the materialized. Now, this will be a bunch of work up front, but I think it comes with a bunch of benefits:
It's not adding expressive power: one could also manually combine the workspace, lockfile, and add the stdlib deps and then run Cargo on it. This means no new code paths downstream of the workspace combination.
Since everything is resolved at once, std features affected by project crate features
I also wonder if it might help with #23 (comment). Combining the workspaces and lockfiles is also a "big global change", so maybe it's OK to use source for mirroring just in that case?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If I'm not misreading the Cargo code:
I don't think this is a good approach, long term:
Conversely, we might inject the crates and (explicit and implicit) stdlib deps to create a unified workspace. We would also combine the lock files to create a lockfile for the combined workspace with the materialized. Now, this will be a bunch of work up front, but I think it comes with a bunch of benefits:
I also wonder if it might help with #23 (comment). Combining the workspaces and lockfiles is also a "big global change", so maybe it's OK to use source for mirroring just in that case?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: