Incorporate Sasha's feedback to clarify ordering is not what matters in non-compliant example

Author: PLeVasseur

src/coding-guidelines/macros.rst

@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ Macros
       where we have unique behavior intended for a particular expression.
 
       If needing to specialize logic within the macro based on a particular
-      expression's value, it may be better to not use a declarative macro.
+      expression's value, it is better to not use a declarative macro.
 
    .. non_compliant_example::
       :id: non_compl_ex_5vK0CCmePkef
@@ -43,6 +43,11 @@ Macros
       matching is done sequentially through the matchers and stops at the first 
       match, the specialized case for EmergencyValve is unreachable.
 
+      The example would also be non-compliant if the ordering of the matchers
+      were reversed as this introduces the possibility of future human-error
+      when refactoring the macro to place the specialized matcher after the
+      generic matcher.
+
       .. code-block:: rust
 
          #[derive(Debug)]