-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 464
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Possible brainflayer not work correctly at the end of seed #118
Comments
Looks like it dies when
is within the very first batch of keys brainflayer processes, but will handle a zero key fine otherwise. |
If you set the starting key to |
This is minor bug, i think the reason in brainflayer start. I haven't looked closely at your code, but suppose that when brainflayer start calculating it trys to calculate 300000+ values, and when seed in the end, it can't do that. If you run bf with values (fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffebaaedce6af48a03bbfd25e8cd0364140 - 7A120) it will work correctly and start searchng at the start of seed 0000...001. I repot this, because don't know it's a bug or a future. May be seed have undocumented featuers. |
Starting with |
Hi. Possible brainflayer not work correctly at the end of seed.
The first valid private key in hexadecimal is 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 and the last valid private key in hexadecimal is fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffebaaedce6af48a03bbfd25e8cd0364140
brainflayer -v -I fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffebaaedce6af48a03bbfd25e8cd0364140 -b example.blf
secp256k1/src/field_impl.h:238: test condition failed: secp256k1_fe_normalizes_to_zero_var(&c)
Aborted
I also try fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffebaaedce6af48a03bbfd25e8cd036413b, and result the same.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: