-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 481
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implementation of finite reflection groups #11187
Comments
comment:2
Apply only trac_11187-finite_reflection_groups-cs.patch |
comment:3
Apply only trac_11187-finite_reflection_groups-cs.patch |
Dependencies: 8327 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:6
Apply only trac_11187-finite_reflection_groups-cs.patch |
Changed dependencies from 8327 to #8327 |
Attachment: trac_11187-finite_reflection_groups-cs.patch.gz |
comment:9
|
comment:10
I've factored out the |
Changed keywords from reflection group to reflection group, days49 |
comment:12
Replying to @tscrim:
I always made some minor changes on this patch locally - I would actually only start working on this patch after you guys are finished with #10963. If you want to actively work on this patch, ping me again, and we can discuss what is still needed to finilize this patch. Cheers, Christian |
comment:16
Hello Christian Do you have a git branch for this ticket somewhere ? or should I try to resurrect the patch ? |
comment:17
No, I don't. But I have a local old version of Sage containing that code and quite a bit more, so I wonder if I should/will try to organize it a bit and put it up here. Do you need any from that code in particular (in which case I am more tempted to work on that), or is that just a general question? |
comment:264
Replying to @stumpc5:
Please let me know if it happen again. |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:267
Should I actually at all still push stuff into this ticket, or should we rather get it to positive review and do everything else in individual tickets? (I have redone the doctest for |
comment:268
Please stop touching anything here if you want this to be positive reviewed soon and not in 4 more years. |
comment:269
That's a little harsh for my taste. Anyway, I agree that I should stop doing anything here, the list of improvements is at #20394. |
comment:270
sorry for that, I am not in a good mood.. |
comment:271
I would rebase this to |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Changed author from Christian Stump to Christian Stump, Frédéric Chapoton, Nicolas Thiery, Travis Scrimshaw |
Reviewer: Christian Stump, Frédéric Chapoton, Nicolas Thiery, Vivian Ripoll, Travis Scrimshaw |
Changed reviewer from Christian Stump, Frédéric Chapoton, Nicolas Thiery, Vivian Ripoll, Travis Scrimshaw to Christian Stump, Frédéric Chapoton, Nicolas Thiéry, Vivien Ripoll, Travis Scrimshaw |
Changed author from Christian Stump, Frédéric Chapoton, Nicolas Thiery, Travis Scrimshaw to Christian Stump, Frédéric Chapoton, Nicolas Thiéry, Travis Scrimshaw |
Changed author from Christian Stump, Frédéric Chapoton, Nicolas Thiéry, Travis Scrimshaw to Christian Stump, Frédéric Chapoton, Nicolas M. Thiéry, Travis Scrimshaw |
Changed reviewer from Christian Stump, Frédéric Chapoton, Nicolas Thiéry, Vivien Ripoll, Travis Scrimshaw to Christian Stump, Frédéric Chapoton, Nicolas M. Thiéry, Vivien Ripoll, Travis Scrimshaw |
comment:276
ok, guys, I think it is time. I am setting to |
comment:277
Great -- thanks to all of you for participating! |
Changed branch from public/11187 to |
This patch implements reflection groups to work with finite (crystallographic, real, complex) reflection groups. It is based on the GAP3 package chevie which is now an experimental package, see #20107.
CC: @sagetrac-vripoll @kevindilks @simon-king-jena @sagetrac-jmichel @hivert
Component: combinatorics
Keywords: reflection group, days49, days64.5, days80
Author: Christian Stump, Frédéric Chapoton, Nicolas M. Thiéry, Travis Scrimshaw
Branch/Commit:
0b6d895
Reviewer: Christian Stump, Frédéric Chapoton, Nicolas M. Thiéry, Vivien Ripoll, Travis Scrimshaw
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/11187
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: