-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 517
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Phased permutation groups #30276
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:5
this seems to generalise to cyclic groups only, no? |
comment:6
each generator is a cycle... |
comment:7
each generator is a product of cycles, in full generality. Then, I think these things are called monomial groups, "phased" comes from physics people not taking algebra classes :-) |
comment:8
Yes, it's a Wolfram-ism, I think |
comment:9
Would these be a generalization of |
comment:10
yes, but with some kind of compatibility relation, I guess. |
comment:12
Setting new milestone based on a cursory review of ticket status, priority, and last modification date. |
Mathematica uses "phased permutations" to express tensor symmetries.
A cycle of length k is labeled with a kth root of unity.
http://reference.wolframcloud.com/language/tutorial/TensorSymmetries.html
This generalizes the symmetries that
sage.tensor
can currently express, which are products of full symmetric groups (where the transpositions in the antisymmetries are labeled with -1).We represent it as a matrix group in GL_n,
and also provide a method that computes its representation as a subgroup of
GL(T^{k,l)M)
.Related reference: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.08056.pdf
CC: @tscrim @egourgoulhon @mjungmath @LBrunswic @mwageringel @dimpase @Ivo-Maffei
Component: combinatorics
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30276
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: