-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 482
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
F-Matrix Factory #30423
Comments
Commit: |
Branch: public/fusion_fmatrix-30423 |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:4
Just a quick comment: you can use
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:13
Setting new milestone based on a cursory review of ticket status, priority, and last modification date. |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:130
The commit 589a5b8 changed the behavior of the root_of_unity method, causing a doctest failure, so I reverted this change. |
comment:131
I am going to insist that this raise a Curiously, this was not failing for me when I was running the tests yesterday via
but now I can reproduce the failure. |
Changed branch from public/new_fmatrix-30423 to public/algebra/fmatrix-30423 |
New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:135
Checked by Dan and Willie. |
Changed branch from public/algebra/fmatrix-30423 to |
comment:137
this broke the linter by adding final empty lines, see #34781 |
Changed commit from |
The FusionRing and its methods contain nearly complete information about the underlying modular tensor category. However information is lost about the associator, and this is captured by the F-matrix or 6j symbols. This ticket adds a method to compute the F-matrices.
This may be tested on the rank <=4 examples in the paper of Rowell, Stong and Wang (arXiv:0712.1377). It is able to compute F-matrices for these examples except the last one, G2 at level 2.
CC: @tscrim @sagetrac-sage-combinat @dwbump @willieab @physicstravels
Component: combinatorics
Keywords: Fusion Ring, F-matrix
Author: Daniel Bump, Guillermo Aboumrad, Galit Anikeeva
Branch:
57825e9
Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30423
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: