Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Upgrade: jupyter-packaging 0.12.3 #34432

Closed
slel opened this issue Aug 25, 2022 · 6 comments
Closed

Upgrade: jupyter-packaging 0.12.3 #34432

slel opened this issue Aug 25, 2022 · 6 comments
Labels
c: packages: standard p: minor / 4 t: bug
Milestone
sage-9.8

Comments

@slel
Copy link
Member

slel commented Aug 25, 2022

The new release jupyter-packaging 0.12.3
fixes a bug reported at #34421.

CC: @slel

Component: packages: standard

Keywords: upgrade, spkg, jupyter_packaging

Author: Samuel Lelièvre

Branch/Commit: 302bf75

Reviewer: Matthias Koeppe

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34432
@slel slel added this to the sage-9.7 milestone Aug 25, 2022
@slel
Copy link
Member Author

slel commented Aug 25, 2022

New commits:

302bf7534432: Upgrade: jupyter-packaging 0.12.3

@slel
Copy link
Member Author

slel commented Aug 25, 2022

Commit: 302bf75

@slel
Copy link
Member Author

slel commented Aug 25, 2022

Branch: u/slelievre/34432

@slel
Copy link
Member Author

slel commented Aug 25, 2022

Author: Samuel Lelièvre

@mkoeppe mkoeppe modified the milestones: sage-9.7, sage-9.8 Sep 19, 2022
@mkoeppe
Copy link
Member

mkoeppe commented Sep 24, 2022

Reviewer: Matthias Koeppe

@vbraun
Copy link
Member

vbraun commented Sep 27, 2022

Changed branch from u/slelievre/34432 to 302bf75

@vbraun vbraun closed this as completed in 154baa5 Sep 27, 2022
@slel slel mentioned this issue Aug 25, 2022
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
c: packages: standard p: minor / 4 t: bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
sage-9.8
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@vbraun @slel @mkoeppe