Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allows triangular morphisms to have domain and codomain with different index sets #8876

Closed
hivert opened this issue May 4, 2010 · 7 comments

Comments

@hivert
Copy link

hivert commented May 4, 2010

Currently triangular morphisms required to have domain and codomain with the
same index sets. The patch remove this limitation by having
TriangularMorphism accept a new argument inverse_on_support. It is
supposed to be a function r : J |--> I returning the leading term i
from the one of j = on_basis(i). This is used by: preimage and
section.

I also wrote the methods co_kernel_projection, co_reduced, and
_test_triangular.

Depend on #8881 and #8742, Apply patch in that order:

Component: categories

Keywords: Triangular Morphisms

Author: Florent Hivert

Reviewer: Jason Bandlow

Merged: sage-4.4.4.alpha0

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/8876

@hivert hivert added this to the sage-4.4.4 milestone May 4, 2010
@hivert hivert self-assigned this May 4, 2010
@hivert
Copy link
Author

hivert commented Jun 2, 2010

comment:1

Attachment: trac_8876-triangular_morphisms_improve-fh.patch.gz

@hivert

This comment has been minimized.

@jbandlow
Copy link

jbandlow commented Jun 3, 2010

Reviewer: Jason Bandlow

@jbandlow
Copy link

jbandlow commented Jun 3, 2010

comment:2

Attachment: trac_8876-reviewer_patch-jb.patch.gz

Hi Florent, I found some issues with the file as I was going through it, which I've fixed in the attached reviewer patch. (Many were probably my fault to begin with.) Everything else looks good to me. If you approve my reviewer patch and verify that all tests pass on massena without prereqs, you can set a positive review. (I will post my reviewer patch on the combinat queue immediately below yours right now.)

@hivert

This comment has been minimized.

@hivert
Copy link
Author

hivert commented Jun 4, 2010

comment:3

Everything was ok with the following patch applied:

trac_8881-functorial_constructions-nt.patch
trac_8742-lazy_format-fh.patch
trac_8742-lazy_format-review-nt.patch
trac_8876-triangular_morphisms_improve-fh.patch
trac_8876-reviewer_patch-jb.patch

Thanks for the review and the corrections. Your patch is good. Positive review

@mwhansen
Copy link
Contributor

mwhansen commented Jun 5, 2010

Merged: sage-4.4.4.alpha0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants