You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently triangular morphisms required to have domain and codomain with the
same index sets. The patch remove this limitation by having
TriangularMorphism accept a new argument inverse_on_support. It is
supposed to be a function r : J |--> I returning the leading term i
from the one of j = on_basis(i). This is used by: preimage and section.
I also wrote the methods co_kernel_projection, co_reduced, and _test_triangular.
Depend on #8881 and #8742, Apply patch in that order:
Hi Florent, I found some issues with the file as I was going through it, which I've fixed in the attached reviewer patch. (Many were probably my fault to begin with.) Everything else looks good to me. If you approve my reviewer patch and verify that all tests pass on massena without prereqs, you can set a positive review. (I will post my reviewer patch on the combinat queue immediately below yours right now.)
Currently triangular morphisms required to have domain and codomain with the
same index sets. The patch remove this limitation by having
TriangularMorphism accept a new argument
inverse_on_support
. It issupposed to be a function
r : J |--> I
returning the leading termi
from the one of
j = on_basis(i)
. This is used by:preimage
andsection
.I also wrote the methods
co_kernel_projection
,co_reduced
, and_test_triangular
.Depend on #8881 and #8742, Apply patch in that order:
Component: categories
Keywords: Triangular Morphisms
Author: Florent Hivert
Reviewer: Jason Bandlow
Merged: sage-4.4.4.alpha0
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/8876
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: