You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since 1 year we still have duplicated file size in our project because of breaking change in BEM syntax. And we only have this third point I mentioned.
(no scss)
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @istiti, thank you for sharing your concerns and for the feature request.
Unfortunately, we do not plan on providing a variations of our static resource. The reason being that we primarily support the Salesforce platform and our teams need both the old and new BEM syntax. Moving forward, new components today are being built with the new syntax, but there are still use cases that utilize the old BEM that we must support. Both will remain in our static resource until the Salesforce platform no longer requires it.
We've provided you with regex in the past to remove the old syntax for your use case. Please feel free to use that in order to bring your file size down. Since the CSS classes are comma separated, I don't think that you will necessarily see a 2x decrease in file size.
After opening
#486 and #467
Can we be smarter and propose static ressources (css files) on https://www.lightningdesignsystem.com vebsite in three versions:
Since 1 year we still have duplicated file size in our project because of breaking change in BEM syntax. And we only have this third point I mentioned.
(no scss)
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: