Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(jinja2): remove excessive jinja, not useful pattern #303

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 7, 2021

Conversation

noelmcloughlin
Copy link
Member

PR progress checklist (to be filled in by reviewers)

  • Changes to documentation are appropriate (or tick if not required)
  • Changes to tests are appropriate (or tick if not required)
  • Reviews completed

What type of PR is this?

Primary type

  • [build] Changes related to the build system
  • [chore] Changes to the build process or auxiliary tools and libraries such as documentation generation
  • [ci] Changes to the continuous integration configuration
  • [feat] A new feature
  • [fix] A bug fix
  • [perf] A code change that improves performance
  • [refactor] A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
  • [revert] A change used to revert a previous commit
  • [style] Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc.)

Secondary type

  • [docs] Documentation changes
  • [test] Adding missing or correcting existing tests

Does this PR introduce a BREAKING CHANGE?

No.

Related issues and/or pull requests

Describe the changes you're proposing

Remove all instances of {{ formula }} as this was experimental pattern but is not useful and too much jinja anyway.

Pillar / config required to test the proposed changes

Debug log showing how the proposed changes work

Documentation checklist

  • Updated the README (e.g. Available states).
  • Updated pillar.example.

Testing checklist

  • Included in Kitchen (i.e. under state_top).
  • Covered by new/existing tests (e.g. InSpec, Serverspec, etc.).
  • Updated the relevant test pillar.

Additional context

Copy link
Contributor

@baby-gnu baby-gnu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm ok with the changes.

Shouldn't the formula: docker in defaults.yaml be removed too?

@noelmcloughlin
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @baby-gnu I implemented your comment. CI passes

@noelmcloughlin noelmcloughlin merged commit a79f8d3 into saltstack-formulas:master Sep 7, 2021
@noelmcloughlin noelmcloughlin deleted the simple branch September 7, 2021 11:21
saltstack-formulas-travis pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2021
## [2.1.1](v2.1.0...v2.1.1) (2021-09-07)

### Code Refactoring

* **jinja2:** remove excessive jinja, not useful pattern ([#303](#303)) ([a79f8d3](a79f8d3))
@saltstack-formulas-travis

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.1.1 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants