-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
FreeBSD port and binaries #756
Comments
@saper thanks for the proposal. But I am afraid we are not going to release compiler falvoured binaries just for FreeBSD, simply because it is not possible to manage. Please stick with the current format as already discussed in our previous conversations. Even if this means only support for FreeBSD v10+. |
It is possible to manage, let me send a simple pull request :) |
@saper, no its not. We are not going to change the format. |
One more question: how can we arrange the binary release process, so that I can prepare binaries for the release before it goes out? Should I just prepare a pull request to http://github.com/sass/node-sass-binaries for v3.0.0-pre ? |
Yes you need to send a PR to node-sass-binaries like that. You only would have to rename the binding.node to Aside: can you test the binary submitted here: sass/node-sass-binaries#49? This is for node v0.12.0 x64. |
@saper Thank you in advance for this work! |
I've been working recently on providing official FreeBSD port of node-sass, focusing on automated building of binaries that shall be included in the http://github.com/sass/node-sass-binaries repository
This bug is about status of this work in progress, hopefully to finish on 3.0.0
freebsd10-x64-m43
frebsd10-x64-m11
freebsd10-x64-m13
freebsd10-ia32-m43
freebsd10-ia32-m11
freebsd10-ia32-m14
freebsd8-x64-m43
freebsd8-x64-m11
freebsd8-x64-m14
freebsd8-ia32-m43
freebsd8-ia32-m11
freebsd8-ia32-m14
freebsd8
binary)freebsd8
binary)freebsd8
binary)freebsd8
binary)freebsd8
binary)freebsd8
binary)npm
to havenode-0.10
available next tonode-0.12
and `iojs - Bug 198220 (comment 3)iojs
not building on GCC-based FreeBSD8.4-RELEASE
- Bug 198349npm
on i386 - Bug 178881 - getifaddrs(3) does not report IPv6 addresses properly in 32-bit compatibility mode - WORKAROUND in the build clusterlibsass
port to 3.1.0 - Bug 198498 - SUBMITTEDlibsass
3.1.0freebsd8
andfreebsd10
) EASYbinding.gyp
to use existing, already compiledlibsass.a
or maybe a sharedlibsass.so
if needed, discussed in node-sass + libsass source coupling #744, Expose config param to allow specific libsass commit for build #389 ("Expose config param to allow specific libsass commit for build") - pull request Build with the unbundled libsass #763The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: