You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm fairly OK with working with gene expression data in Seurat, but it's been a while since I've done anything with Signac and ATAC/multiome single-cell data.
One thing I've noticed recently is that multiome guides for Seurat/Signac all suggest doing QC for nCount_RNA and nCount_ATAC rather than nFeature_RNA and nFeature_ATAC. Following the tutorial for Seurat PBMC expression you see that the advice is to filter on number of features:
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I'm fairly OK with working with gene expression data in Seurat, but it's been a while since I've done anything with Signac and ATAC/multiome single-cell data.
One thing I've noticed recently is that multiome guides for Seurat/Signac all suggest doing QC for nCount_RNA and nCount_ATAC rather than nFeature_RNA and nFeature_ATAC. Following the tutorial for Seurat PBMC expression you see that the advice is to filter on number of features:
pbmc <- subset(pbmc, subset = nFeature_RNA > 200 & nFeature_RNA < 2500 & percent.mt < 5)
However, if you follow the Weighted Nearest Neighbour tutorial for multiome, the advice is to filter on counts:
pbmc <- subset(x = pbmc, subset = nCount_ATAC < 7e4 & nCount_ATAC > 5e3 & nCount_RNA < 25000 & nCount_RNA > 1000 & percent.mt < 20)
Can anyone clarity the discrepancy here?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions