Compile-time conditional implicit (if fails, continue implicit search) #15895
Unanswered
adamw
asked this question in
Metaprogramming
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Not completely sure what you are trying to do. Can you give an example of what you want to happen and what happens currently? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Is there a way to define an implicit value, but only if a compile-time condition is met, so that the implicit search continues (using lower-precedence values) if the condition is false?
This would be trivial if not for the second part: the inline/macro can simply report a compile-time error if the condition is false and be done with it. However, I'd like to define a special-case implicit for which a compile-time check needs to be done.
I've tried with transparent implicits, sth like:
However, despite being
transparent
, and despite returning the right sub-type from the macro implementation, theYes
implicit is never found.Even a simple
implicitly[MyCondition.Yes[T]]]
fails, so I guess the type of transparent implicits isn't refined before implicit search resolution?But maybe there's another way to define a conditional implicit as described above?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions