This file is intended to provide a place for developers and contributors to document what other developers need to know about changes made to Puppet.
When working on subsystems of Puppet that deal with the catalog it is important to be aware of the two different types of Catalog. Developers will often find this difference while working on the static compiler and types and providers.
The two different types of catalog becomes relevant when writing spec tests because we frequently need to wire up a fake catalog so that we can exercise types, providers, or termini that filter the catalog.
The two different types of catalogs are so-called "resource" catalogs and "RAL" (resource abstraction layer) catalogs. At a high level, the resource catalog is the in-memory object we serialize and transfer around the network. The compiler terminus is expected to produce a resource catalog. The agent takes a resource catalog and converts it into a RAL catalog. The RAL catalog is what is used to apply the configuration model to the system.
Resource dependency information is most easily obtained from a RAL catalog by
walking the graph instance produced by the relationship_graph
method.
If you're writing spec tests for something that deals with a catalog "server side," a new catalog terminus for example, then you'll be dealing with a resource catalog. You can produce a resource catalog suitable for spec tests using something like this:
let(:catalog) do
catalog = Puppet::Resource::Catalog.new("node-name-val") # NOT certname!
rsrc = Puppet::Resource.new("file", "sshd_config",
:parameters => {
:ensure => 'file',
:source => 'puppet:///modules/filetest/sshd_config',
}
)
rsrc.file = 'site.pp'
rsrc.line = 21
catalog.add_resource(rsrc)
end
The resources in this catalog may be accessed using catalog.resources
.
Resource dependencies are not easily walked using a resource catalog however.
To walk the dependency tree convert the catalog to a RAL catalog as described
in
The resource catalog may be converted to a RAL catalog using catalog.to_ral
.
The RAL catalog contains Puppet::Type
instances instead of Puppet::Resource
instances as is the case with the resource catalog.
One very useful feature of the RAL catalog are the methods to work with resource relationships. For example:
irb> catalog = catalog.to_ral
irb> graph = catalog.relationship_graph
irb> pp graph.edges
[{ Notify[alpha] => File[/tmp/file_20.txt] },
{ Notify[alpha] => File[/tmp/file_21.txt] },
{ Notify[alpha] => File[/tmp/file_22.txt] },
{ Notify[alpha] => File[/tmp/file_23.txt] },
{ Notify[alpha] => File[/tmp/file_24.txt] },
{ Notify[alpha] => File[/tmp/file_25.txt] },
{ Notify[alpha] => File[/tmp/file_26.txt] },
{ Notify[alpha] => File[/tmp/file_27.txt] },
{ Notify[alpha] => File[/tmp/file_28.txt] },
{ Notify[alpha] => File[/tmp/file_29.txt] },
{ File[/tmp/file_20.txt] => Notify[omega] },
{ File[/tmp/file_21.txt] => Notify[omega] },
{ File[/tmp/file_22.txt] => Notify[omega] },
{ File[/tmp/file_23.txt] => Notify[omega] },
{ File[/tmp/file_24.txt] => Notify[omega] },
{ File[/tmp/file_25.txt] => Notify[omega] },
{ File[/tmp/file_26.txt] => Notify[omega] },
{ File[/tmp/file_27.txt] => Notify[omega] },
{ File[/tmp/file_28.txt] => Notify[omega] },
{ File[/tmp/file_29.txt] => Notify[omega] }]
If the relationship_graph
method is throwing exceptions at you, there's a
good chance the catalog is not a RAL catalog.
Be aware that Puppet creates a mini catalog and applies this catalog locally to manage file resource from the settings. This behavior made it difficult and time consuming to track down a race condition in 2888.
Even more surprising, the File[puppetdlockfile]
resource is only added to the
settings catalog if the file exists on disk. This caused the race condition as
it will exist when a separate process holds the lock while applying the
catalog.
It may be sufficient to simply be aware of the settings catalog and the potential for race conditions it presents. An effective way to be reasonably sure and track down the problem is to wrap the File.open method like so:
# We're wrapping ourselves around the File.open method.
# As described at: http://goo.gl/lDsv6
class File
WHITELIST = [ /pidlock.rb:39/ ]
class << self
alias xxx_orig_open open
end
def self.open(name, *rest, &block)
# Check the whitelist for any "good" File.open calls against the #
puppetdlock file
white_listed = caller(0).find do |line|
JJM_WHITELIST.find { |re| re.match(line) }
end
# If you drop into IRB here, take a look at your caller, it might be
# the ghost in the machine you're looking for.
binding.pry if name =~ /puppetdlock/ and not white_listed
xxx_orig_open(name, *rest, &block)
end
end
The settings catalog is populated by the Puppet::Util::Settings#to\_catalog
method.
To install the dependencies run:
$ bundle install --path .bundle/gems/
Once this is done, you can interact with puppet through bundler using bundle exec <command>
which will ensure that <command>
is executed in the context
of puppet's dependencies.
For example to run the specs:
$ bundle exec rake spec
To run puppet itself (for a resource lookup say):
$ bundle exec puppet resource host localhost
which should return something like:
host { 'localhost':
ensure => 'present',
ip => '127.0.0.1',
target => '/etc/hosts',
}
Puppet Labs projects use a common convention of using Rake to run unit tests. The tests can be run with the following rake task:
bundle exec rake spec
This allows the Rakefile to set up the environment beforehand if needed. This method is how the unit tests are run in Jenkins.
Under the hood Puppet's tests use rspec
. To run all of them, you can directly
use 'rspec':
bundle exec rspec
To run a single file's worth of tests (much faster!), give the filename, and use the nested format to see the descriptions:
bundle exec rspec spec/unit/ssl/host_spec.rb --format nested
Puppet is only compatible with certain versions of RSpec and Mocha. If you are not using Bundler to install the required test libraries you must ensure that you are using the right library versions. Using unsupported versions of Mocha and RSpec will probably display many spurious failures. The supported versions of RSpec and Mocha can be found in the project Gemfile.
Puppet relies heavily on automated testing to ensure that Puppet behaves as expected and that new features don't interfere with existing behavior. There are three primary sets of tests that Puppet uses: unit tests, integration tests, and acceptance tests.
Unit tests are used to test the individual components of Puppet to ensure that they function as expected in isolation. Unit tests are designed to hide the actual system implementations and provide canned information so that only the intended behavior is tested, rather than the targeted code and everything else connected to it. Unit tests should never affect the state of the system that's running the test.
Integration tests serve to test different units of code together to ensure that they interact correctly. While individual methods might perform correctly, when used with the rest of the system they might fail, so integration tests are a higher level version of unit tests that serve to check the behavior of individual subsystems.
All of the unit and integration tests for Puppet are kept in the spec/ directory.
Acceptance tests are used to test high level behaviors of Puppet that deal with a number of concerns and aren't easily tested with normal unit tests. Acceptance tests function by changing system state and checking the system after the fact to make sure that the intended behavior occurred. Because of this acceptance tests can be destructive, so the systems being tested should be throwaway systems.
All of the acceptance tests for Puppet are kept in the acceptance/tests/ directory.
- Travis-ci (unit tests only): https://travis-ci.org/puppetlabs/puppet/
- Jenkins (unit and acceptance tests): https://jenkins.puppetlabs.com/view/Puppet%20FOSS/
Puppet uses RSpec to perform unit and integration tests. RSpec handles a number of concerns to make testing easier:
- Executing examples and ensuring the actual behavior matches the expected behavior (examples)
- Grouping tests (describe and contexts)
- Setting up test environments and cleaning up afterwards (before and after blocks)
- Isolating tests (mocks and stubs)
At the most basic level, RSpec provides a framework for executing tests (which are called examples) and ensuring that the actual behavior matches the expected behavior (which are done with expectations)
# This is an example; it sets the test name and defines the test to run
specify "one equals one" do
# 'should' is an expectation; it adds a check to make sure that the left argument
# matches the right argument
1.should == 1
end
# Examples can be declared with either 'it' or 'specify'
it "one doesn't equal two" do
1.should_not == 2
end
Good examples generally do as little setup as possible and only test one or two things; it makes tests easier to understand and easier to debug.
More complete documentation on expectations is available at https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/docs
Example groups are fairly self explanatory; they group similar examples into a set.
describe "the number one" do
it "is larger than zero" do
1.should be > 0
end
it "is an odd number" do
1.odd?.should be true
end
it "is not nil" do
1.should_not be_nil
end
end
Example groups have a number of uses that we'll get into later, but one of the simplest demonstrations of what they do is how they help to format documentation:
rspec ex.rb --format documentation
the number one
is larger than zero
is an odd number
is not nil
Finished in 0.00516 seconds
3 examples, 0 failures
Examples may require some setup before they can run, and might need to clean up
afterwards. before
and after
blocks can be used before this, and can be
used inside of example groups to limit how many examples they affect.
describe "something that could warn" do
before :each do
# Disable warnings for this test
$VERBOSE = nil
end
after do
# Enable warnings afterwards
$VERBOSE = true
end
it "doesn't generate a warning" do
MY_CONSTANT = 1
# reassigning a normally prints out 'warning: already initialized constant FOO'
MY_CONSTANT = 2
end
end
Some examples may require setting up data before hand and making it available to
tests. RSpec provides helper methods with the let
method call that can be used
inside of tests.
describe "a helper object" do
# This creates an array with three elements that we can retrieve in tests. A
# new copy will be made for each test.
let(:my_helper) do
['foo', 'bar', 'baz']
end
it "should be an array" do
my_helper.should be_a_kind_of Array
end
it "should have three elements" do
my_helper.should have(3).items
end
end
Like before
blocks, helper objects like this are used to avoid doing a lot of
setup in individual examples and share setup between similar tests.
RSpec allows you to provide fake data during testing to make sure that individual tests are only running the code being tested. You can stub out entire objects, or just stub out individual methods on an object. When a method is stubbed the method itself will never be called.
While RSpec comes with its own stubbing framework, Puppet uses the Mocha framework.
A brief usage guide for Mocha is available at http://gofreerange.com/mocha/docs/#Usage, and an overview of Mocha expectations is available at http://gofreerange.com/mocha/docs/Mocha/Expectation.html
describe "stubbing a method on an object" do
let(:my_helper) do
['foo', 'bar', 'baz']
end
it 'should have three items before being stubbed' do
my_helper.size.should == 3
end
describe 'when stubbing the size' do
before do
my_helper.stubs(:size).returns 10
end
it 'should have the stubbed value for size' do
my_helper.size.should == 10
end
end
end
Entire objects can be stubbed as well.
describe "stubbing an object" do
let(:my_helper) do
stub(:not_an_array, :size => 10)
end
it 'should have the stubbed size'
my_helper.size.should == 10
end
end
It's possible to combine the concepts of stubbing and expectations so that a method has to be called for the test to pass (like an expectation), and can return a fixed value (like a stub).
describe "mocking a method on an object" do
let(:my_helper) do
['foo', 'bar', 'baz']
end
describe "when mocking the size" do
before do
my_helper.expects(:size).returns 10
end
it "adds an expectation that a method was called" do
my_helper.size
end
end
end
Like stubs, entire objects can be mocked.
describe "mocking an object" do
let(:my_helper) do
mock(:not_an_array)
end
before do
not_an_array.expects(:size).returns 10
end
it "adds an expectation that the method was called" do
not_an_array.size
end
end
When properly written each test should be able to run in isolation, and tests should be able to be run in any order. This makes tests more reliable and allows a single test to be run if only that test is failing, instead of running all 17000+ tests each time something is changed. However, there are a number of ways that can make tests fail when run in isolation or out of order.
Puppet has a number of older tests that use before
blocks and instance
variables to set up fixture data, instead of let
blocks. These can retain
state between tests, which can lead to test failures when tests are run out of
order.
# test.rb
RSpec.configure do |c|
c.mock_framework = :mocha
end
describe "fixture data" do
describe "using instance variables" do
# BAD
before :all do
# This fixture will be created only once and will retain the `foo` stub
# between tests.
@fixture = stub 'test data'
end
it "can be stubbed" do
@fixture.stubs(:foo).returns :bar
@fixture.foo.should == :bar
end
it "should not keep state between tests" do
# The foo stub was added in the previous test and shouldn't be present
# in this test.
expect { @fixture.foo }.to raise_error
end
end
describe "using `let` blocks" do
# GOOD
# This will be recreated between tests so that state isn't retained.
let(:fixture) { stub 'test data' }
it "can be stubbed" do
fixture.stubs(:foo).returns :bar
fixture.foo.should == :bar
end
it "should not keep state between tests" do
# since let blocks are regenerated between tests, the foo stub added in
# the previous test will not be present here.
expect { fixture.foo }.to raise_error
end
end
end
bundle exec rspec test.rb -fd
fixture data
using instance variables
can be stubbed
should not keep state between tests (FAILED - 1)
using `let` blocks
can be stubbed
should not keep state between tests
Failures:
1) fixture data using instance variables should not keep state between tests
Failure/Error: expect { @fixture.foo }.to raise_error
expected Exception but nothing was raised
# ./test.rb:17:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
Finished in 0.00248 seconds
4 examples, 1 failure
Failed examples:
rspec ./test.rb:16 # fixture data using instance variables should not keep state between tests
- RSpec core docs: https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-core/docs
- RSpec guidelines with Ruby: http://betterspecs.org/
Puppet has a custom acceptance testing framework called puppet-acceptance for running acceptance tests. Puppet-acceptance runs the tests by configuring one or more VMs, copying the test cases onto the VMs, performing the tests and collecting the results, and ensuring that the results match the intended behavior. It uses test::unit to perform the actual assertions.
As Ruby 1.9 becomes more commonly used with Puppet, developers should be aware of major changes to the way Strings and Regexp objects are handled. Specifically, every instance of these two classes will have an encoding attribute determined in a number of ways.
- If the source file has an encoding specified in the magic comment at the top, the instance will take on that encoding.
- Otherwise, the encoding will be determined by the LC_LANG or LANG environment variables.
- Otherwise, the encoding will default to ASCII-8BIT
Excellent information about the differences between encodings in Ruby 1.8 and Ruby 1.9 is published in this blog series: Understanding M17n
In general, please be aware that Ruby 1.9 regular expressions need to be compatible with the encoding of a string being used to match them. If they are not compatible you can expect to receive and error such as:
Encoding::CompatibilityError: incompatible encoding regexp match (ASCII-8BIT
regexp with UTF-8 string)
In addition, some escape sequences were valid in Ruby 1.8 are no longer valid in 1.9 if the regular expression is not marked as an ASCII-8BIT object. You may expect errors like this in this situation:
SyntaxError: (irb):7: invalid multibyte escape: /\xFF/
This error is particularly common when serializing a string to other representations like JSON or YAML. To resolve the problem you can explicitly mark the regular expression as ASCII-8BIT using the /n flag:
"a" =~ /\342\230\203/n
Finally, any time you're thinking of a string as an array of bytes rather than an array of characters, common when escaping a string, you should work with everything in ASCII-8BIT. Changing the encoding will not change the data itself and allow the Regexp and the String to deal with bytes rather than characters.
Puppet provides a monkey patch to String which returns an encoding suitable for byte manipulations:
# Example of how to escape non ASCII printable characters for YAML.
>> snowman = "☃"
>> snowman.to_ascii8bit.gsub(/([\x80-\xFF])/n) { |x| "\\x#{x.unpack("C")[0].to_s(16)} }
=> "\\xe2\\x98\\x83"
If the Regexp is not marked as ASCII-8BIT using /n, then you can expect the SyntaxError, invalid multibyte escape as mentioned above.
If you'd like to run Puppet from source on Windows platforms, the
include ext/envpuppet.bat
will help.
To quickly run Puppet from source, assuming you already have Ruby installed from rubyinstaller.org.
C:\> cd C:\work\puppet
C:\work\puppet> set PATH=%PATH%;C:\work\puppet\ext
C:\work\puppet> envpuppet bundle install
C:\work\puppet> envpuppet puppet --version
2.7.9
When writing a test that cannot possibly run on Windows, e.g. there is no mount type on windows, do the following:
describe Puppet::MyClass, :unless => Puppet.features.microsoft_windows? do
..
end
If the test doesn't currently pass on Windows, e.g. due to on going porting, then use an rspec conditional pending block:
pending("porting to Windows", :if => Puppet.features.microsoft_windows?) do
<example1>
end
pending("porting to Windows", :if => Puppet.features.microsoft_windows?) do
<example2>
end
Then run the test as:
C:\work\puppet> envpuppet bundle exec rspec spec
-
Don't assume file paths start with '/', as that is not a valid path on Windows. Use Puppet::Util.absolute_path? to validate that a path is fully qualified.
-
Use File.expand_path('/tmp') in tests to generate a fully qualified path that is valid on POSIX and Windows. In the latter case, the current working directory will be used to expand the path.
-
Always use binary mode when performing file I/O, unless you explicitly want Ruby to translate between unix and dos line endings. For example, opening an executable file in text mode will almost certainly corrupt the resulting stream, as will occur when using:
IO.open(path, 'r') { |f| ... } IO.read(path)
If in doubt, specify binary mode explicitly:
IO.open(path, 'rb')
-
Don't assume file paths are separated by ':'. Use
File::PATH_SEPARATOR
instead, which is ':' on POSIX and ';' on Windows. -
On Windows,
File::SEPARATOR
is '/', andFile::ALT_SEPARATOR
is ''. On POSIX systems,File::ALT_SEPARATOR
is nil. In general, use '/' as the separator as most Windows APIs, e.g. CreateFile, accept both types of separators. -
Don't use waitpid/waitpid2 if you need the child process' exit code, as the child process may exit before it has a chance to open the child's HANDLE and retrieve its exit code. Use Puppet::Util.execute.
-
Don't assume 'C' drive. Use environment variables to look these up:
"#{ENV['windir']}/system32/netsh.exe"
In Puppet 3.x we've simplified the behavior of selecting a configuration file
to load. The intended behavior of reading puppet.conf
is:
- Use the explicit configuration provided by --confdir or --config if present
- If running as root (
Puppet.features.root?
) then use the systempuppet.conf
- Otherwise, use
~/.puppet/puppet.conf
.
When Puppet master is started from Rack, Puppet 3.x will read from
~/.puppet/puppet.conf by default. This is intended behavior. Rack
configurations should start Puppet master with an explicit configuration
directory using ARGV << "--confdir" << "/etc/puppet"
. Please see the
ext/rack/files/config.ru
file for an up-to-date example.
If you need to programmatically work with the Puppet version, please use the following:
require 'puppet/version'
# Get the version baked into the sourcecode:
version = Puppet.version
# Set the version (e.g. in a Rakefile based on `git describe`)
Puppet.version = '2.3.4'
Please do not monkey patch the constant Puppet::PUPPETVERSION
or obtain the
version using the constant. The only supported way to set and get the Puppet
version is through the accessor methods.
The static compiler was added to Puppet in the 2.7.0 release. 1
The static compiler is intended to provide a configuration catalog that requires a minimal amount of network communication in order to apply the catalog to the system. As implemented in Puppet 2.7.x and Puppet 3.0.x this intention takes the form of replacing all of the source parameters of File resources with a content parameter containing an address in the form of a checksum. The expected behavior is that the process applying the catalog to the node will retrieve the file content from the FileBucket instead of the FileServer.
The high level approach can be described as follows. The StaticCompiler
is a
terminus that inserts itself between the "normal" compiler terminus and the
request. The static compiler takes the resource catalog produced by the
compiler and filters all File resources. Any file resource that contains a
source parameter with a value starting with 'puppet://' is filtered in the
following way in a "standard" single master / networked agents deployment
scenario:
- The content, owner, group, and mode values are retrieved from th FileServer by the master.
- The file content is stored in the file bucket on the master.
- The source parameter value is stripped from the File resource.
- The content parameter value is set in the File resource using the form '{XXX}1234567890' which can be thought of as a content address indexed by checksum.
- The owner, group and mode values are set in the File resource if they are not already set.
- The filtered catalog is returned in the response.
In addition to the catalog terminus, the process requesting the catalog needs
to obtain the file content. The default behavior of puppet agent
is to
obtain file contents from the local client bucket. The method we expect users
to employ to reconfigure the agent to use the server bucket is to declare the
Filebucket[puppet]
resource with the address of the master. For example:
node default {
filebucket { puppet:
server => $server,
path => false,
}
class { filetest: }
}
This special filebucket resource named "puppet" will cause the agent to fetch file contents specified by checksum from the remote filebucket instead of the default clientbucket.
Create a module that recursively downloads something. The jeffmccune-filetest module will recursively copy the rubygems source tree.
$ bundle exec puppet module install jeffmccune-filetest
Start the master with the StaticCompiler turned on:
$ bundle exec puppet master \
--catalog_terminus=static_compiler \
--verbose \
--no-daemonize
Add the special Filebucket[puppet] resource:
# site.pp
node default {
filebucket { puppet: server => $server, path => false }
class { filetest: }
}
Get the static catalog:
$ bundle exec puppet agent --test
You should expect all file metadata to be contained in the catalog, including a checksum representing the content. When managing an out of sync file resource, the real contents should be fetched from the server instead of the clientbucket.
Please see the public API regarding the software version as described in
lib/puppet/version.rb
. Puppet provides the means to easily specify the exact
version of the software packaged using the VERSION file, for example:
$ git describe --match "3.0.*" > lib/puppet/VERSION
$ ruby -r puppet/version -e 'puts Puppet.version'
3.0.1-260-g9ca4e54
EOF