Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

handle assert.skip #26

Closed
scottcorgan opened this issue Apr 1, 2015 · 6 comments
Closed

handle assert.skip #26

scottcorgan opened this issue Apr 1, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@scottcorgan
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@hville
Copy link

hville commented Sep 4, 2015

This would be really nice since future test get hidden as passed. Unfortunately, it looks like the 'tap-out' parser doesn't support it out of the box. Would you consider another parser (eg. tap-parser) or did you already had a plan on how to go about this?

@shime
Copy link

shime commented Oct 6, 2015

👍

@scottcorgan
Copy link
Owner Author

What does your unformatted TAP output look like when you skip a test?

@shime
Copy link

shime commented Oct 6, 2015

yeah, sorry about that... found out this is related to tape, so it should probably wait until tape-testing/tape#197 lands, at least when used with tape

@scottcorgan
Copy link
Owner Author

Will keep open until that's addressed in tape

@keithamus
Copy link

FYI @scottcorgan I've added some details in tap-out about TODO and SKIP tests - see scottcorgan/tap-out#16

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants