Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integrate UsrSCTP into OSS-Fuzz #353

Closed
benjwright opened this issue Aug 21, 2019 · 7 comments
Closed

Integrate UsrSCTP into OSS-Fuzz #353

benjwright opened this issue Aug 21, 2019 · 7 comments
Assignees

Comments

@benjwright
Copy link
Contributor

Given the recent fuzzing discoveries in UsrSCTP it seems like it would be useful to on board the project to OSS-Fuzz: https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz

#351, #352 and #255 could all benefit from having automated continuous fuzzing.

@weinrank
Copy link
Contributor

Yep, I'm currently working on this. :)

@benjwright
Copy link
Contributor Author

Awesome, just filling an issue here to track it since it was suggested in another bug.

@tuexen
Copy link
Member

tuexen commented Aug 25, 2019

04d617c is the initial step within this project.

@benjwright
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the great work here!

@weinrank
Copy link
Contributor

The usrsctp library is getting fuzzed by the OSS-FUZZ project.
We haven't seen any bug reports.

I'll extend the collection of fuzzers and corpora in the future.
Another issue is the slow execution of the fuzzing targets in connected mode.
While the unconnected fuzzer reaches about 5,500 executions per second, the connected fuzzer only reaches about 50 executions per second.

@tuexen
Copy link
Member

tuexen commented Aug 28, 2019

@weinrank Thanks a lot for your work! Can this issue be closed now that it is integrated in OSS-FUZZ?

@weinrank
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, it can be closed.
We can probably recycle this issue for future discussions / status updates regarding the OSS-FUZZ project.

@tuexen tuexen closed this as completed Aug 28, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants