Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add some new maintainers #522

Closed
jaxxstorm opened this issue Jul 21, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

Add some new maintainers #522

jaxxstorm opened this issue Jul 21, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@jaxxstorm
Copy link
Contributor

The speed this module moves at, considering the importance to the sensu community and the high usage doesn't really seem acceptable to me.

I would like to see some more maintainers added, or at least the current maintainers actively reviewing pull requests.

@jamtur01
Copy link
Contributor

jamtur01 commented Jul 21, 2016

Are you volunteering? Happy to add anyone who is interested! Sadly, between $Dayjob, other projects, and family, current folks are pretty busy.

@jaxxstorm
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes absolutely, I would love to help.

@jamtur01
Copy link
Contributor

Sure. I'll add you as a collaborator. Some rough rules @jlambert121 and I have been working off (and he's definitely done most of the recent work):

  1. Nothing added without tests and documentation.
  2. We're roughly SemVer - backwards incompatible interface/API changes require appropriate version bumps.
  3. Best features for most number of users - avoid custom settings and configuration designed to address edge cases at the expense of ease of use.

@dalesit
Copy link

dalesit commented Jul 21, 2016

Great news. I have #485 waiting (since March) if someone could have a look - addresses #269 which has been open since November 2014!

@jaxxstorm
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks! I'll get cracking on some of the backlog ASAP!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants