You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: 2501-3000/2862. Maximum Element-Sum of a Complete Subset of Indices.swift
+19
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -3,8 +3,27 @@ class Solution {
3
3
// Solution by Sergey Leschev
4
4
// 2862. Maximum Element-Sum of a Complete Subset of Indices
5
5
6
+
// Intuition
7
+
// A set of numbers is considered complete if the product of every pair of its elements is a perfect square.
8
+
// In this problem, we are given an array of integers and are tasked with finding the maximum possible sum of elements in a complete subset of indices.
9
+
10
+
// Approach
11
+
// To tackle this problem, we start by determining the "key" for each index in the array.
12
+
// This key is found by iteratively dividing the index by all possible square numbers until we can no longer do so.
13
+
// For example, the key of index 1 is 1, the key of index 18 is 2, and the key of index 24 is 6. In a complete set, all indices share the same key.
14
+
15
+
// We maintain a dictionary count to keep track of the sum of elements associated with each key.
16
+
// For each index i in the array, we find its key x, accumulate A[i] to count[x], and update our result res as the maximum between its current value and count[x].
17
+
// Finally, we return res as our result, which represents the maximum possible sum of a complete subset of indices in the given array.
18
+
19
+
// By using this approach, we can efficiently determine the maximum element-sum for a complete subset of indices,
20
+
// ensuring the product of their elements is always a perfect square.
21
+
6
22
// Time complexity: O(n)
7
23
// Space complexity: O(n)
24
+
// The process to determine each key has a time complexity of O(sqrt(n)).
25
+
// However, by precalculating all the keys, the final solution becomes O(n).
26
+
// In fact, the complexity can be simplified to O(n) due to the sum of a convergent series (1 + 1/4 + 1/9 + ...).
0 commit comments