Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Frame UI in Ubuntu 17 looks unusual #20581

Closed
tigercosmos opened this issue Apr 7, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

Frame UI in Ubuntu 17 looks unusual #20581

tigercosmos opened this issue Apr 7, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@tigercosmos
Copy link
Contributor

tigercosmos commented Apr 7, 2018 •
edited
Loading

test in master branch

The application frame UI (not webpage rendering) looks very different in Ubuntu 17, and I am sure it is not all application UI would change in Ubuntu 17, since Firefox, Chrome's UI are as same as in Ubuntu 16.

Ubuntu 17
default

Ubuntu 16
default

Other application in Ubuntu 17
you can see the frame is very "Ubuntu"
default
@tigercosmos tigercosmos changed the title UI in Ubuntu 17 looks unusual Frame UI in Ubuntu 17 looks unusual Apr 7, 2018
@atouchet
Copy link
Contributor

atouchet commented Apr 7, 2018

I believe that is due to issues with Wayland support.

@tigercosmos
Copy link
Contributor Author

What is Wayland? Are there issue related opened before?

@atouchet
Copy link
Contributor

atouchet commented Apr 7, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Wayland is a display server protocol alternative to X11. Ubuntu switched to use it by default in 17.10. There is an open issue for it here: #9558

Also related: rust-windowing/winit#306

@dralley
Copy link
Contributor

dralley commented Mar 24, 2020

Close in favor of the Wayland metabug?

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Mar 24, 2020

Yep.

@jdm jdm closed this as completed Mar 24, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@jdm @dralley @tigercosmos @atouchet