You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It's possible to derive this from the scope tree, but slightly annoying. And it's useful for certain types of transformations: for example, assuming no dynamic scope,
x&&x.a();x&&x.b();
can be transformed into
x&&(x.a(),x.b());
if x is known to be local and x is known not to be closed over.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's possible to derive this from the scope tree, but slightly annoying. And it's useful for certain types of transformations: for example, assuming no dynamic scope,
can be transformed into
if
x
is known to be local andx
is known not to be closed over.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: