-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update liquid dependency to 0.20 #879
Comments
It's certainly possible, but there are a few breaking changes in liquid 0.20, and it doesn't work out of the box. |
@sharkdp will send PR in 10 minutes or so. |
Sounds great. Note that liquid is a build-only dependency. So it shouldn't really matter for packaging, as long as it is a binary package (not a from-source build), right? |
Understood. I thought there would be binary RPM/DEB-style packages that end-users could install directly without building from source (while maintainers would obviously need all dependencies to build the package in the first place). Does this mean that we need a new release for Fedora? |
Yes, sure. Users won't need it, but I am a maintainer so I need to package all dependencies :) No, we don't necessarily need a new release. I can just backport it. |
Ok, thank you! closed via #880 |
I'm now working on updating bat to 0.13 in Fedora and we have liquid 0.12 while bat depends on 0.19... Would it be possible to update this dependency?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: