You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently the ls command seems a bit inconvenient to use for me since it outputs a long, yet a bit sparse list of text requiring a lot of scrolling to find the variable, function or unit I am actually looking for.
To improve I would suggest two changes:
Use a multi-column layout to reduce the vertical space a bit and to get an immediate glance on all defined variables/functions.
Add subcommands ls variables, ls functions, ls units and ls dimensions to add the possibility to list only variables, functions, units or dimensions, respectively.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Use a multi-column layout to reduce the vertical space a bit and to get an immediate glance on all defined variables/functions.
👍
Add subcommands ls variables, ls functions, ls units and ls dimensions to add the possibility to list only variables, functions, units or dimensions, respectfully.
👍
Maybe we can also come up with a syntax to specifically look up length units, for example? Like ls units Length. Because that should be fairly easy to implement as well.
Currently the
ls
command seems a bit inconvenient to use for me since it outputs a long, yet a bit sparse list of text requiring a lot of scrolling to find the variable, function or unit I am actually looking for.To improve I would suggest two changes:
ls variables
,ls functions
,ls units
andls dimensions
to add the possibility to list only variables, functions, units or dimensions, respectively.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: