We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rustyline
reedline
https://crates.io/crates/rustyline https://crates.io/crates/reedline
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think realistically using one of those 2 is the correct move, it will get rid of like 40% of the code and all the awkwardness in the code-base.
It was fun writing stuff from scratch but I think using a readline crate would make irust better
rustyline is solid but its maintained by a single person, reedline probably is what we want and it uses crossterm internally
The problem is reedline compared to rustyline has this limitation crossterm-rs/crossterm#396 but there is a pr filed for this , so I think its fine
Sorry, something went wrong.
irust_repl
No branches or pull requests
https://crates.io/crates/rustyline
https://crates.io/crates/reedline
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: