-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature Request] Support 32-bit Linux #1661
Comments
I think it could be because you're using a 32-bit distribution, and our builds are for 64-bit distributions. Is there a particular reason you're on a 32-bit distro? |
Low power system. Intel Celeron 1.40GHz 2G Ram |
Thx |
I have the same issue @scottnonnenberg , do you have a 32 bit release yet? |
@spacealiens No, not yet. Can you tell me why you need 32-bit support? Most devices out there are 64-bit these days. |
@scottnonnenberg , point taken. I will backup my home dir and format/re-install 64bit version. Thx! |
some users I support still need to use 32bit OS because the device does not support 64bit. I don't know for how much people out there this applies, but just to report that it would be very good to have a working 32bit version to support these users. Anyway, it would be important to mention on the download page that its only supported for 64bit! |
I would love to have a 32bit version. Still use my old trusty Macbook A1181 (white plastic box: 3GB Ram) with Linux and it runs perfectly (but I only could get 32bit Linux to run). Would be topnotch having signal on this machine. |
Also, it's worthwhile to mention that most nations of the world use low end, low power processors and can't afford or have newer and next gen processors which run 64bit OS-es. Many of our oversea clients stations are all legacy and run 32 bit OS-es. These people are most vulnerable from surveillance states and weak civil liberties, and are the users who need our support most. |
It might be worth mentioning that running a 32bit system on hardware like @optio50 described does not necessarily save power. The CPUs queues have a higher throughput and a lot of recent software is also optimized in that direction. You might get somewhat better performance and even (very small) less power consumption if you would be running 64bit. The only downside can be slightly higher memory requirements in a few situations. Running 32bit only makes sense on CPUs that actually only support 32bit (or very early amd64 cpus like Opterons). If we talk about saving power, we should talk about arm builds for SBCs like RPi or such. On the x86 side, a modern Intel NUC System with a modern (64bit) lower-power CPU will draw sub-10W when idle, less than such old celeron systems. That being said, the download page certainly misses the note 'Only for 64bit xenial based distributions'! |
yeah. at least mention that it is only 64 bit. you dont get an appropriate error message when using the official instructions. it just sais package not found which is confusing since it finds them if you use apt search or tabulator autocomplete. i am also runnig a laptop with a 32bit cpu. the laptop is fast enough for daily use, is silent and has a power saving T2080 cpu. the only problem i get with this decive is when applications choose to drop 32bit support. |
I also mistakenly started using Signal assuming it had 32bit support. As my laptop can't handle 64bit, I'll have to look for alternatives. Please specify that you don't provide this support, it's misleading otherwise. |
i also need support for 32 bit system |
+1 |
Please note: We are talking about adding 32bit builds to the repository. You can of course build Signal yourself. |
Thanks everyone for your input on this, locking the issue for now. I'm not sure what repository @dragetd is talking about; it's not this one. |
Linux Mint 17.10 32 Bit
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: