Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Request] Allow importing stickers without assigning an emoji to each sticker #4759

Closed
N7le opened this issue Jan 8, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

Comments

@N7le
Copy link

N7le commented Jan 8, 2021

When importing stickers through the desktop application on Linux, you are asked to add an emoji to each sticker so stickers can be suggested while messaging. This is a good feature, but you can't import stickers unless all stickers are assigned an emoji (the "Next" button is disabled). I'm currently importing my 1000+ stickers from whatsapp, so having to do this process for every single sticker is tedious. Can this feature be optional?

@Ed1123
Copy link

Ed1123 commented Feb 6, 2021

I think I'm gonna do something on JS that selects a given emoji for all stickers using the dev console. It shouldn't be that difficult (if I knew JS enough xD).

@Ed1123
Copy link

Ed1123 commented Feb 7, 2021

I think I'm gonna do something on JS that selects a given emoji for all stickers using the dev console. It shouldn't be that difficult (if I knew JS enough xD).

Here is the code in case you're interested @N7le. It is meant to be run on the JavaScript console when importing stickers (View -> Toggle Developer Tools). It selects the star emoji for all stickers.

https://gist.github.com/Ed1123/d72e0d3fbd89cdd00ac63d1d74d0debe

I'm far from expert with JS, but it works. 😄

If you want I can help you running it.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 24, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants