You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 12, 2023. It is now read-only.
Due to a lack of documentation, I'm facing some difficulties in understanding the waveform
First, I have tried to reproduce the results from this example that Heagy went through in this video to compare with the results from SimpegEM1D but they are not similar.
Second, I have tried to understand why in some cases the time zero in the waveform is setting when the current is one, and in other situations, like in this example not. This is the point that makes me more confused
Finally, to achieve my goal that is to have a good forward that returns the Jacobian and the predicted data, I tried to compare the 3 waveforms: VTEM, TEMFAST, and trapezoidal.The real case I'm studying is a square loop performed with TEMFAST equipment and I don't understand why I can't predict well the data with the original waveform
Last question: why to extract the Jacobian I need to multiply by a vector?
J = []
for i in range(len(model)):
ei = np.zeros_like(model)
ei[i] = 1.0
J.append(simulation.Jvec(model, ei, f=fields))
J = np.vstack(J)
Is this the Jacobian that is called several times during the inversion?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Hello,
Due to a lack of documentation, I'm facing some difficulties in understanding the waveform
First, I have tried to reproduce the results from this example that Heagy went through in this video to compare with the results from SimpegEM1D but they are not similar.
Second, I have tried to understand why in some cases the time zero in the waveform is setting when the current is one, and in other situations, like in this example not. This is the point that makes me more confused
Finally, to achieve my goal that is to have a good forward that returns the Jacobian and the predicted data, I tried to compare the 3 waveforms: VTEM, TEMFAST, and trapezoidal.The real case I'm studying is a square loop performed with TEMFAST equipment and I don't understand why I can't predict well the data with the original waveform
Last question: why to extract the Jacobian I need to multiply by a vector?
Is this the Jacobian that is called several times during the inversion?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: