Implement a hasPseudoElementStyle assertion

[joankaradimov]

Resolves #229

[Turbo87]

nice work @joankaradimov! this looks awesome already, just one minor thing left to do :)

[joankaradimov]

nice work @joankaradimov!

Thanks!

just one minor thing left to do :)

I've committed the suggested change.

Just let me know if everything else looks good so that I squash the commits.

[joankaradimov]

It turns out the initial overload signature for hasPseudoElementStyle was the correct one. The one in a858a73 does not generate any documentation. I've reverted it.

Also there seemed to be some code which did not have a documentation generated for it. I've committed that separately.

Finally - there are some DOS new lines mixed with the Unix new lines in the examples in API.md. This appears to be the case for the existing examples too. There are no DOS new lines in the docstrings. Should I log a bug for that?

[Turbo87]

there are some DOS new lines mixed with the Unix new lines in the examples in API.md. This appears to be the case for the existing examples too. There are no DOS new lines in the docstrings. Should I log a bug for that?

Interesting. That sounds like a bug (or maybe even feature 🤔) in documentation to me

[Turbo87]

@joankaradimov the problem with documentation is that is does not pick up the docs from these method specializations. I've moved the docstring on the method implementation, while keeping the selector: string specialization and now it seems to work as intended :)

[joankaradimov]

I've moved the docstring on the method implementation

Ah, ok. I was thinking of something different.

there seemed to be some code which did not have a documentation generated for it.

I see you made this private and removed the commit.

I'm going to squash the rest of it and force push.

[Turbo87]

thanks again 🙏

[joankaradimov]

Thank you for the help and the quick responses. And also for quickly releasing this!