You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The genericism of Stabilizer is a limitation to the performance when using Pounder (input stage limited in slew rate, distortion noise to achieve flexibility, layout is tight and complex/high viscosity, component choice trade-offs, software/assembly/debugging complexity).
I'd like to consider a single board hardware variant of Stabilizer+Pounder with the following deliberations:
Single board (debugability, reduced complexity of mechanics, software etc)
Use CPU's ADC and DACs, no external ADCs, DACs
no PGIA, merged IF amp and ADC gain+shifting stages
no EEM/LVDS interface
design and layout revised for 70 dB RF isolation (input-output and between channels, i.e. at the level of the DDS)
potentially a variant with an FPGA as coprocessor: then it would be a consolidated version of FastServo+Pounder, i.e. Zynq again with external ADC
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The genericism of Stabilizer is a limitation to the performance when using Pounder (input stage limited in slew rate, distortion noise to achieve flexibility, layout is tight and complex/high viscosity, component choice trade-offs, software/assembly/debugging complexity).
I'd like to consider a single board hardware variant of Stabilizer+Pounder with the following deliberations:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: