Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change BNC connectors #13

Closed
dtcallcock opened this issue Dec 5, 2018 · 19 comments
Closed

Change BNC connectors #13

dtcallcock opened this issue Dec 5, 2018 · 19 comments

Comments

@dtcallcock
Copy link
Member

dtcallcock commented Dec 5, 2018

Sampler is the only place in Sinara where one is forced to use BNCs and an 8HP panel.

Standardising all boards to 4HP may be advantageous for a future backplane.

MMCX would be an obvious choice as we are already using it for the Sayma v2 AFE analog inputs and Stabilizer aux digital inputs. However, they are a bit on the small side and easy to disengage compared SMB/MCX so one might worry about mechanical robustness. SMC/Micro BNC/LEMO all seem somewhat less ubiquitous and more expensive. My slight preference would be for MCX, but it would be good to hear from people with more experience. I'm not totally sure how you would isolate this kind of connector from the front panel though (just a clearance hole?).

Even if we all agreed this is a brilliant idea, it probably doesn't warrant a board revision right away. I did want to leave an issue open in this repository for future reference though.

@dhslichter
Copy link
Member

Just need to think a little about crosstalk (granted, BNC is not great for this either). But I agree that MCX or SMB or other smaller connectors would be nice.

@dtcallcock
Copy link
Member Author

@hartytp makes the point that:

Personally, I also like BNCs. Much quicker to swap in and out. Much easier to make ones own cables to length quickly and cheaply.

It seems that MCX is even easier to swap in and out than BNC and connectors are available that, at first glance, don't look any harder to assemble than a BNC connector (eg. this RG-316 connector).

However I do buy the argument that most labs have a lot of BNC stuff around and a proliferation of random connectors across Sinara should be avoided (hence my opinion that we should just pick one general BNC replacement). The board could also optionally ship with 8 BNC pigtails.

Just need to think a little about crosstalk (granted, BNC is not great for this either).

A random search suggests that MCX might have >70dB RF leakage (compared to >100dB for an SMA and >55dB for BNC). MMCX seems similar to MCX and SMB seems similar to BNC. Exact numbers depend on mfg/cable obviously.

@dhslichter
Copy link
Member

SMB leakage is lousy, so I generally don't like them. If MCX is better then rock on.

@dtcallcock
Copy link
Member Author

Btw, we have one of these Seeed mini-scopes with MCX connectors on it and they seem pretty nice to me.

It shipped with the kind of BNC pigtails that @gkasprow mentioned. I also found some SMA adaptors that enable use of standard SMA cables, but at high density (as one doesn't have to leave room for the torque wrench).

img_3199

@gkasprow
Copy link
Member

DSO203? I have such model for 4 years or so and can confirm that these probe connectors work reliably.

@jordens
Copy link
Member

jordens commented Dec 19, 2018

Could be my "DSO Quad" and would be 6 or 7 years old now.

@gkasprow
Copy link
Member

The assembly house asked us to make some cosmetic changes that would improve the production yield.
I will also add mounting holes for CPCIS adapter. Do we plan to change the BNC connectors and switch to 4HP?

@gkasprow
Copy link
Member

MCX version would look like this
obraz

@hartytp
Copy link
Collaborator

hartytp commented Feb 18, 2019

I’m happy with either BNC or MCX

@jordens
Copy link
Member

jordens commented Feb 18, 2019

Go for mcx.

@gkasprow
Copy link
Member

Do you want MCX-BNC adapters to be delivered with Sampler?
Would such cable be fine?
obraz

They cost roughly 2EUR/pc

@jordens
Copy link
Member

jordens commented Feb 19, 2019

Ah. One thing to check: those small mcx to sma bullet adapters. Do they fit or is the pitch to small for sma?
Yes. I'd include 8 of those pigtails.

@gkasprow
Copy link
Member

I tried with the biggest SMA-MCX adapters I could find and it will work. Of course, SMA needs to be attached prior to plugging. I do not recommend using these adapters with thick and long SMA cables because they will add tension to the MCX connectors and the PCB. Cable adapters seem to be a better choice.

obraz

@gkasprow
Copy link
Member

There is no collision with the handle
obraz

@dtcallcock
Copy link
Member Author

+1 for MCX and pigtails

@hartytp
Copy link
Collaborator

hartytp commented Mar 21, 2020

@gkasprow @jordens and others, do we want to do anything here for the next revision, or leave this to further down the line? I'm okay with MCX so long as we ship with MCX to BNC pigtails.

@gkasprow
Copy link
Member

The Sampler board can be ordered with MCX adapter board, so I'm leaving it as it is now with BNCs.

@dtcallcock
Copy link
Member Author

Added note about this to wiki.

@gkasprow
Copy link
Member

gkasprow commented Jul 6, 2021

Btw, one can already order such Samplers. TS did a production run AFAIK.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants