-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[python] for an Experiment, soma.open
is 3X slower than soma.Experiment.open
#2726
Labels
Comments
johnkerl
changed the title
[python] for an Experiment, soma.open is 3X slower than soma.Experiment.open
[python] for an Experiment, Jun 13, 2024
soma.open
is 3X slower than soma.Experiment.open
On investigation:
|
FYI: @ypatia - latency-related (this case is not proxied, but demonstrates another access pattern that is latency-sensitive) |
@ypatia @bkmartinjr I have a write-up not written down yet -- fully analyzed in my head & in scratch notes -- will follow up post-retreat ... |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
On a TileDB Cloud URI that points to a SOMA Experiment,
soma.open
is substantially slower thansoma.Experiment.open
.Ideally these would be the of similar performance, allowing the convenience of using the generic opener.
The use of TileDB-Py (e.g.,
tiledb.Group()
) is even faster yet, and ideally would be the benchmark time.Example:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: