You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be helpful to have the ability to constrain actions by type as well as the other existing constraint properties. This would allow slightly more flexibility for routing specific types of actions to certain handlers. Being able to constrain by type allows you to route actions that may have different types but the same callback_id (or other constraint properties), or even route all actions of a specific type to one handler (regardless of callback_id, action_id or block_id. Sharing things like a callback_id across different action types sounds weird at first, but I've bumped into some places where this would be useful.
What type of issue is this? (place an x in one of the [ ])
bug
enhancement (feature request)
question
documentation related
testing related
discussion
Requirements (place an x in each of the [ ])
I've read and understood the Contributing guidelines and have done my best effort to follow them.
Description
It would be helpful to have the ability to constrain actions by
type
as well as the other existing constraint properties. This would allow slightly more flexibility for routing specific types of actions to certain handlers. Being able to constrain bytype
allows you to route actions that may have differenttypes
but the samecallback_id
(or other constraint properties), or even route all actions of a specifictype
to one handler (regardless ofcallback_id
,action_id
orblock_id
. Sharing things like acallback_id
across different action types sounds weird at first, but I've bumped into some places where this would be useful.What type of issue is this? (place an
x
in one of the[ ]
)Requirements (place an
x
in each of the[ ]
)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: