Footnote target unclear in many places

[pgmmpk]

From Dobrotolyubie 1_01.xml:

<p>рл҃и. Сме́ртное безсмє́ртнымъ подлежи́тъ, безсме́ртное же 
смє́ртнымъ:<footnote lang="cu">Безсме́ртное здѣ́сь за долговре́менное и҆ 
долгопребыва́ющее бере́тсѧ.</footnote> слꙋ́жатъ, си́рѣчь, стїхі̑и человѣ́кꙋ, 
по человѣколю́бїю, и҆ врожде́нной въ ни́хъ бла́гости созда́вшагѡ бг҃а.</p>

Or 2_03.xml:

...Поне́же ᲂу҆́бѡ по писа́нїю, всѧ́ко дре́во, не творѧ́щее плода̀ добра̀ 
посѣка́етсѧ, и҆ во ѻ҆́гнь вмета́етсѧ:<footnote lang="cu">Лꙋкѝ гл. г҃, ст. ѳ҃.</footnote> 
ꙗ҆́вѣ, ꙗ҆́кѡ ѡ҆ плода́хъ всѐ на́ше тща́нїе до́лженствꙋетъ...

It is hardly reasonable to use the last word of the preceding phrase as footnote target. Especially when target is Jesus' parable.

How the original renders this? As a numbered superscript? Maybe we should leave superscript and mark this up as <sup>1</sup><footnote...?

[typiconman]

I think these need to be reviewed manually. They're probably only in Dobrotolyubie, which is a bit special, since it's not a liturgical text.

[typiconman]

Is there a way to generate a list of questionable footnotes that need to be reviewed? Perhaps all footnotes that don't have a kavyka or an asterisk nearby?

[pgmmpk]

Yes, I have scripts here to generate Markdown. Footnote target is being searched for with regexes. When regex can not find target, this should be a red flag.

I will post some questionable footnotes to review when get some time. No point in reviewing everything.