Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Encryption: encrypt files from existing asar archive #42

Closed
sleeyax opened this issue May 20, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

Encryption: encrypt files from existing asar archive #42

sleeyax opened this issue May 20, 2022 · 4 comments
Labels
feature New feature good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@sleeyax
Copy link
Owner

sleeyax commented May 20, 2022

Currently we only expose an API to encrypt an existing source/dist/build folder. It would be nice to also have an API to encrypt an existing asar archive as a whole.

@sleeyax sleeyax added feature New feature good first issue Good for newcomers labels May 20, 2022
@burgil
Copy link

burgil commented Jun 1, 2022

I agree, I taught it's already possible through the beforePack and afterPack as said in the readme, But, I'm eager to use it through the CLI (and pack asar files)! Good work!

@sleeyax
Copy link
Owner Author

sleeyax commented Jun 2, 2022

I agree, I taught it's already possible through the beforePack and afterPack as said in the readme

Then you must have overlooked that by mistake because even in the README it's only shown that input source folders are supported at the moment. This issue addresses this limitation so we can just specify a source .asar file and get an output .asar file instead.

Repository owner deleted a comment from tgmstudios Dec 21, 2023
@srcastor
Copy link

Any updates about that?

@sleeyax
Copy link
Owner Author

sleeyax commented Jan 25, 2024

No. Feel free to work on it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New feature good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants