Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Runtime Invisible Annotations #120

Closed
MikeEdgar opened this issue May 26, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #129
Closed

Runtime Invisible Annotations #120

MikeEdgar opened this issue May 26, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #129
Assignees
Labels
breaking-change Changes that break API backwards compatibility serialization-format-change Changes that affect index serialization format
Milestone

Comments

@MikeEdgar
Copy link
Member

We had an issue a few weeks back smallrye/smallrye-open-api#716 requesting information to be utilized from a @Retention(RetentionPolicy.CLASS) annotation. I'm curious if there is any interest in having runtime invisible annotations present in an index. I suppose the original reason for leaving them out was to more closely match reflection APIs, correct? Is this something that could be a candidate for version 3?

@Ladicek Ladicek added this to the 3.0.0 milestone Aug 10, 2021
@Ladicek Ladicek added the breaking-change Changes that break API backwards compatibility label Aug 23, 2021
@Ladicek
Copy link
Contributor

Ladicek commented Sep 14, 2021

Done in #129.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
breaking-change Changes that break API backwards compatibility serialization-format-change Changes that affect index serialization format
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants