You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I really like the fact that this package captures messages from message(), warning() and stop(). IMO it is a potential killer feature.
However, I miss a simple way to specify that "I want to log all messages of level INFO or higher", etc. As I understand it, currently, one has to specify all levels explicitly in the log_file() call. It would be very useful if the levels were ordered, for instance DEBUG > INFO > (SIMPLE)MESSAGE > WARN = SIMPLEWARNING > ERROR > SIMPLEERROR = CRITICAL.
Other logging systems I've seen do this by assigning a numerical value to each symbolic log level, and then test for >= num_log_level. Would it be possible to implement something like this in loggr? I think it would be very useful, and it would also make it easy to add custom log levels.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I really like the fact that this package captures messages from message(), warning() and stop(). IMO it is a potential killer feature.
However, I miss a simple way to specify that "I want to log all messages of level INFO or higher", etc. As I understand it, currently, one has to specify all levels explicitly in the log_file() call. It would be very useful if the levels were ordered, for instance DEBUG > INFO > (SIMPLE)MESSAGE > WARN = SIMPLEWARNING > ERROR > SIMPLEERROR = CRITICAL.
Other logging systems I've seen do this by assigning a numerical value to each symbolic log level, and then test for >= num_log_level. Would it be possible to implement something like this in loggr? I think it would be very useful, and it would also make it easy to add custom log levels.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: