Update to use newer version of ChefSpec (~> 3.1) #129
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
carmstrong
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2014
Update to use newer version of ChefSpec (~> 3.1)
|
Great, thanks! I'll see what I can do to clean up the rest. |
|
This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Update to use ChefSpec ~> 3.1. There are still a bunch of tests failing, but this puts the cookbook in a better position. Most of the failures are now due to the refactoring of the openjdk recipe I believe.
Sorry I am not able to do anymore, but I gotta get back to some work stuff for the rest of the day!