Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

A question about Inception-v4 #2

Closed
wlw208dzy opened this issue May 10, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

A question about Inception-v4 #2

wlw208dzy opened this issue May 10, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@wlw208dzy
Copy link

wlw208dzy commented May 10, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Thanks for your wonderful work! I noticed that you updated the inception-v4.py 5 days ago. The modification is that you swap the concating order of “pool branch” and “conv branch" in stem1 block. To my understanding, this may not affect the model. Would you mind to tell me why you have done this modification? Thanks!
@soeaver
Copy link
Owner

soeaver commented May 11, 2016 •
edited
Loading

@wlw208dzy
In fact, the modification has no effect to train inception_v4. I swap the concating order because I would like to strictly follow the concating order in Figure 3 of Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and
the Impact of Residual Connections on Learning.

@YeonjaeShin YeonjaeShin mentioned this issue Oct 11, 2017
Closed
@hp-93 hp-93 mentioned this issue Feb 28, 2018
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@soeaver @wlw208dzy