You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This addition would allow for enhanced testing functionality, as well as proper representation of existing repositories. This looks like having multiple repositories with multiple files in each of them. Each repository should have different amounts/types of changes , ensuring our modules can work on a variety repositories.
Example
Test_repo_1
file_1.md
file_2.md
file_3.md
Test_repo_2
file_1.md
file_2.md
Referencing these comments
Consider the use of range and join to help create a more programmatic string of numbers as you have here.
Existing issue check
Description
This addition would allow for enhanced testing functionality, as well as proper representation of existing repositories. This looks like having multiple repositories with multiple files in each of them. Each repository should have different amounts/types of changes , ensuring our modules can work on a variety repositories.
Example
Test_repo_1
Test_repo_2
Referencing these comments
Consider the use of
range
andjoin
to help create a more programmatic string of numbers as you have here.Originally posted by @d33bs in discussion
Consider adding a comparison for high entropy vs low entropy with an additional assert below (should one be higher than the other)?
Originally posted by @d33bs in discussion
Consider finding a way to avoid the repetition for the baseline content additions to these files (while retaining the same outcome).
Originally posted by @d33bs in Creating Shannon Entropy calculation function and editing test datasets #65 (comment)
Consider adding another check to make sure that the file sets are different from one another.
Originally posted by @d33bs in Creating Shannon Entropy calculation function and editing test datasets #65 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: