-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
If you get the best result, I need your help☺️ #8
Comments
The accuracy seems be limited under 79% whatever i do anything..... And i find mine non-random initialization implementation doesn't work fine, which accuracy is lower than without it. |
l look forward to the non-random initialization part too |
@wangkangnian |
@wangkangnian @guyibang |
@Ien001 thanks for your share, i'll tyr for it |
would you share the non-random initialization part?thank you! @wangkangnian |
@Ien001 thanks for your share, I tried it but still could not get top1 acc > 0.85. What tricks did you use in terms of training parameters and lr strategy? |
@Ien001 could you please share you initialization part? it really confused me a couple days... |
Hi @wangkangnian Can you share your weights where you got 79% accuracy? I could only reach 52% at best. If you could not share the weights, could you let me know the changes in code you made w.r.t the repo? Thanks!! |
Thanks for clicking into this issue!
If you get 85.14% as the final accuracy, as reported in the homepage, would you please share the loss value when the program reached the best result, the initial learning rate, and the transform of the data?😊😊
I only get 78.6% at best. Every time I run my program, it seems like I will get random results, ranging from 74.0% ~ 78.6%.
The updates I have done:
Resnet-50 based model & no-random initialization
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: