Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

If you get the best result, I need your help☺️ #8

Open
Ien001 opened this issue Dec 13, 2018 · 9 comments
Open

If you get the best result, I need your help☺️ #8

Ien001 opened this issue Dec 13, 2018 · 9 comments

Comments

@Ien001
Copy link

Ien001 commented Dec 13, 2018

Thanks for clicking into this issue!

If you get 85.14% as the final accuracy, as reported in the homepage, would you please share the loss value when the program reached the best result, the initial learning rate, and the transform of the data?😊😊

I only get 78.6% at best. Every time I run my program, it seems like I will get random results, ranging from 74.0% ~ 78.6%.

The updates I have done:
Resnet-50 based model & no-random initialization

@wangkangnian
Copy link

wangkangnian commented Dec 17, 2018

The accuracy seems be limited under 79% whatever i do anything..... And i find mine non-random initialization implementation doesn't work fine, which accuracy is lower than without it.
Could you post your implementation of non-random initialization?
Besides, what your dataset is? When i use CUB2010+2011, accuracy increases a lot.

@guyibang
Copy link

l look forward to the non-random initialization part too

@Ien001
Copy link
Author

Ien001 commented Jan 14, 2019

@wangkangnian
I used CUB-200-2011 dataset.
I will post my part of no-random initialization, if it helps.

@Ien001
Copy link
Author

Ien001 commented Jan 15, 2019

@wangkangnian @guyibang
I have posted my part of non-random initialization.
I wish it may help you guys a bit.😊

@guyibang
Copy link

@Ien001 thanks for your share, i'll tyr for it

@chaerlo
Copy link

chaerlo commented Apr 15, 2019

would you share the non-random initialization part?thank you! @wangkangnian

@wjtan99
Copy link

wjtan99 commented Jun 27, 2019

@Ien001 thanks for your share, I tried it but still could not get top1 acc > 0.85. What tricks did you use in terms of training parameters and lr strategy?

@limengyang9368
Copy link

@Ien001 could you please share you initialization part? it really confused me a couple days...

@aparnaambarapu
Copy link

The accuracy seems be limited under 79% whatever i do anything..... And i find mine non-random initialization implementation doesn't work fine, which accuracy is lower than without it.
Could you post your implementation of non-random initialization?
Besides, what your dataset is? When i use CUB2010+2011, accuracy increases a lot.

Hi @wangkangnian Can you share your weights where you got 79% accuracy? I could only reach 52% at best. If you could not share the weights, could you let me know the changes in code you made w.r.t the repo? Thanks!!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants