Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

attempt to index local 'location' error #209

Open
kapral18 opened this issue Mar 2, 2024 · 10 comments
Open

attempt to index local 'location' error #209

kapral18 opened this issue Mar 2, 2024 · 10 comments

Comments

@kapral18
Copy link

kapral18 commented Mar 2, 2024

image

I don't have anything special in my config except just the plugin string for sg.nvim on top of latest lazyvim distro

@tjdevries
Copy link
Contributor

Can you run :checkhealth sg for me? And please update to latest plugin, I just pushed some pretty big changes

@tjdevries
Copy link
Contributor

The error is still happening?

@kapral18
Copy link
Author

@tjdevries yepp

@kapral18
Copy link
Author

Can you run :checkhealth sg for me? And please update to latest plugin, I just pushed some pretty big changes

I noticed and I tried. I also nuked nvim instance with cache and state folders to make sure it's not affecting.

Still the same result unfortunately

@tjdevries
Copy link
Contributor

Does this PR fix your problem? #221

@kapral18
Copy link
Author

kapral18 commented Mar 15, 2024

PR removes the error output, but going to definition still doesn't work

@amazr
Copy link

amazr commented Apr 9, 2024

Also seeing this. Just logging the error in textDocument/definition gives: 'RPC[Error] code_name = ParseError, message = "No corresponding code intelligence"'. Some extra context that may or may not be relevant is that my sg url is not the default one.

@daniel-hernandez-sony
Copy link

I am also seeing this error with the default sourcegraph url and my health check looks healthy. Happy to give any extra info!

image

@kqvanity
Copy link

I'm using it on a local instance, and getting the same error as well

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants