New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

how do we approximate number of reads annotated to strain? #1079

Closed

ctb opened this issue Jul 3, 2020 · 1 comment

Contributor

ctb commented Jul 3, 2020

per #549 (comment),

@DivyaRavichandar asked,

Would it be reasonable to go to from f_unique_weighted to an approximation of reads annotated to a strain by f_unique_weighted*read_depth_in_sample?

I responded:

my naive thinking is that f_unique_weighted * number of reads should be what you're looking for. but I haven't thought that through :)

...so, I should think this through! and do some simulations...

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

ctb mentioned this issue

Interpreting abundance #549

Closed

Contributor Author

ctb commented Mar 12, 2022

yep! issue discussed more clearly over in #1881, with receipts, so closing this.

ctb closed this as completed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment