We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SBT is growing, and is now spread in three different places:
sourmash_lib.sbt
sourmash_lib.sbtmh
sourmash_lib.sbt_storage
The proposal is to create a new sbt submodule in sourmash, and move the separate files into a new structure:
sourmash_lib.sbt.mh
sourmash_lib.sbt.storage
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This would be neat. Especially if the API allowed easy experimentation with arbitrary sequences, e.g. DNA, signatures etc.
Sorry, something went wrong.
note that the command line API is heading in the other direction with #240 - 'sbt_search' -> 'search', etc.
Yes, please.
No branches or pull requests
SBT is growing, and is now spread in three different places:
sourmash_lib.sbt
: the standard SBT implementation, using bloom filters for internal nodes and leaves.sourmash_lib.sbtmh
: the MinHash extensions, with a leaf node for MinHashes and a search function.sourmash_lib.sbt_storage
: Different storage backends for SBTsThe proposal is to create a new sbt submodule in sourmash, and move the separate files into a new structure:
sourmash_lib.sbt
, also containing possible subcommand options for SBTssourmash_lib.sbt.mh
sourmash_lib.sbt.storage
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: